jimg
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Messages
- 2,039
LOL...if this bit gets you howling how are you going to handle NAIS? 
"Suspected dog fighters" are just that...suspected. They are not criminals unless convicted. Seems someone interested in personal rights would recognize that.kidr said:Big Brother has made another inroad into Virginia. When you now take your dog to the vet. you are reported to the local licensing agency, so if your dogs aren't licensed you will receive a bill. i'm not against licensing. but I think this is a breach of client privacy. My vet. feels the same. He is not required to report suspected dog fighters. I guess criminals have more privacy rights than decent people.
So "suspected child molesters " shouldn't be reported or investigated? How is someone convicted before they're suspected and investigated?LMTC said:"Suspected dog fighters" are just that...suspected. They are not criminals unless convicted. Seems someone interested in personal rights would recognize that.
Just further progress in its status as a police state.kidr said:Big Brother has made another inroad into Virginia. When you now take your dog to the vet. you are reported to the local licensing agency, so if your dogs aren't licensed you will receive a bill. i'm not against licensing. but I think this is a breach of client privacy. My vet. feels the same. He is not required to report suspected dog fighters. I guess criminals have more privacy rights than decent people.