The rotor bearing on a 5 foot cutter will need to revolve about 200 more times per minute, a 25% increase in order to pick up tip speed from 13,000 to 16,000 fpm. So one may argue that with all things being equal, the slower rotor will last longer between major overhauls and failures.
Also, doubtful that most blades of grass being struck by a 25 pound cutter blade will appreciate any difference between being struck by one traveling at 180 mph vs one crawling along at a leisurely 160mph.
Yikes, then there's the mass of the blade to consider. Kinetic energy= 1/2(mass) x (velocity) x (velocity). So it's easier /cheaper for a manufacturer to get more energy to the blade tip by increasing its rotational speed than increasing its mass. But a heavier blade will be more durable than a light one.
So, just can't look at blade tip speed as its only one of several variables.