DAP
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2001
- Messages
- 1,199
- Tractor
- JD LX288 and a B7800
I've seen many posts by folks tackling leveling projects with their Boxblades by going in reverse (implement first).
I understand this will alleviate a ground contact problem created by changes in elevation as the tractor wheels move through rise and falls.
My question: Wouldn't this reverse approach put some serious stresses on the lower arms and perhaps the top link also? Compared to the mass of the box itself, the lower arms seem vulnerable to bending, breaking or failing otherwise.
Now I've never done this yet, but it very well could be in my future as I have a serious drive problem. I haven't decided whether to tackle it myself with a box or have a dozer contract do it.
Clearly, implements on standard tractor designs were made to pull things - pushing things backwards seems a lil nebulous.
I understand this will alleviate a ground contact problem created by changes in elevation as the tractor wheels move through rise and falls.
My question: Wouldn't this reverse approach put some serious stresses on the lower arms and perhaps the top link also? Compared to the mass of the box itself, the lower arms seem vulnerable to bending, breaking or failing otherwise.
Now I've never done this yet, but it very well could be in my future as I have a serious drive problem. I haven't decided whether to tackle it myself with a box or have a dozer contract do it.
Clearly, implements on standard tractor designs were made to pull things - pushing things backwards seems a lil nebulous.