</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Sometimes experience is costly. If it is something that was caused by the manufacture, they should pay. But, if it was caused by lack of experience, the new owner should pay. )</font>
I agree, Jerry, with qualifications. With so many people having related problems, how can the manufacturer gather evidence which proves faulty operation. Also, if this can be done within the normal range of movement, then there is certainly an argument for the problem being the design rather than the user. It is far cheaper for the manufacturer to warrant and replace the parts than to monitor each operator and gather specific operational technique information. In this instance, the operator has concrete evidence of failure without any evidence of abuse. It falls to the manufacturer to replace the parts because the warranty says they will. When the warranty expires, then it's the owner's responsibilty to prove faulty design or reach for his own wallet. That's just the way the system works, right or wrong.
NH55: I'm just discussing the philosophy of the warranty issue. I'm not inferring in any way that you did anything wrong. I sure hope you have a better run of luck with your next cylinder.