Rockbadchild
Elite Member
I am/was currency in the process and gathering quotes and getting my barn drawing done for the barn, we are planning to start this summer. Also got the ball rolling with the building permits and restriction and what not. My first curve ball came reel quick, the only part accessible by vehicle of my land is under a flood zone, for one I didn't know we had these zone which make my whole land useless, the existing house and garage is in this so call flood zone which is 3 meter above the existing creek bank and extend 400ft on each side, the creek is 2 feet deep, 2 feet wide and dry most of the year. I am currently contesting this with the city. I am not happy my lawyer didn't informed me of this during the purchase... anyhow,
I have some exposure to these calculation within my education but no field experience.
I send the elevation differences with the flood zone a and creek watershed basin with the highest recoded rainfall (bigger then the region 100 year storm) and the creek natural basin is well capable (with its natural banks) to take care of this biggest recorded rainfall even without creek outflows and soil, vegetal absorption and retention, so I didn't bother kept going to the rest of the calculation with all the other variable like soil abortion, runoff coefficient, watershead slope and roughness coefficients and antecedent condition variables since these would only make my case more obvious, I did the worse case scenario one can make and it pass so no further investigation needed is my reasoning ... I proposed a new outline with these two straight froward calculation and send it out to the city. The city lady didn't know what I was talking about despite explaining it dummy proof and sent it to their consultant for referral. so now I wait.
so what can I expect (answer and time) ? will it be a no brainier ? will I need a detail survey and study done ?, what are your thought and experience on the matter ?
pink = 230 elevation
red= city flood zone
sky blue= natural creek flood zone
dark blue=creek
creek bank elevation 227
I proposed to have the sky blue as flood zone, I would settle for the pink line.
the barn we want to build
I have some exposure to these calculation within my education but no field experience.
I send the elevation differences with the flood zone a and creek watershed basin with the highest recoded rainfall (bigger then the region 100 year storm) and the creek natural basin is well capable (with its natural banks) to take care of this biggest recorded rainfall even without creek outflows and soil, vegetal absorption and retention, so I didn't bother kept going to the rest of the calculation with all the other variable like soil abortion, runoff coefficient, watershead slope and roughness coefficients and antecedent condition variables since these would only make my case more obvious, I did the worse case scenario one can make and it pass so no further investigation needed is my reasoning ... I proposed a new outline with these two straight froward calculation and send it out to the city. The city lady didn't know what I was talking about despite explaining it dummy proof and sent it to their consultant for referral. so now I wait.
so what can I expect (answer and time) ? will it be a no brainier ? will I need a detail survey and study done ?, what are your thought and experience on the matter ?
pink = 230 elevation
red= city flood zone
sky blue= natural creek flood zone
dark blue=creek
creek bank elevation 227
I proposed to have the sky blue as flood zone, I would settle for the pink line.
the barn we want to build