I dont charge by the acre because conditions can vary so wildly. Here’s an example why:
Customer 1 has a 20 acre meadow with straight grass and no “issues”. If I charge by the hour, I would get it done in 5 hours and make $1,000.
Customer 2 also has 20 acres, but hilly pasture with woody invasives and goldenrod to clog the radiator. It takes much longer because you have to go slower and be more careful, blow out radiator, etc. If I charge by the hour and it takes me 8 hours, I get what Customer 1 above pays me, plus extra money because it took 3 hours longer. Thats the way it should be. You get paid for you time spent working.
If you charged by the
acre, you get paid the same for Customer 1 and Customer 2, but Customer 2 took you 3
more hours. Who would do that?
You’d lose money on Customer #2. Lose enough money and you’ll sell your equipment.
Let the hours you run your equipment dictate your gross income on a job.
The only other way might be charging by neither the hour or the acre, but by the
job.
You give the customer a set price “not to exceed $x,xxx“. I don’t usually do this, but if I sense a customer doesnt like being charged by the hour, I do my best to estimate the # of hours and multiply by ~$200/hour.
Has worked for me for 30 years, so I must be doing something right
Here’s some typical more complicated ground to cut with power lines, fence lines,
railroads, etc. It slows you down, so hourly helps you make more money.
Here’s a hilly meadow with trees and a creek at the bottom. Probably takes an hour to do 2 acres. I wouldn’t want to mow 2 acres for $35/acre…... $70 would be far too low.