bx2200 review

   / bx2200 review #1  

Anonymous Poster

Epic Contributor
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
29,678
Hi folks,
I took a couple of days off to get some work done with the bx, and felt that a review of the machine's capabilities here would be helpful for those looking to buy a bx. I ran an old Power King 1618 w/fel for the last seven years(a very early version of a subcut??) on my 5 acres, for moving stone, snow, etc. I have been mowing for a while with the bx and doing some fel work, but nothing that would push the machine's limits until this week. I have:
bx2200, fel, 54" mmm, filled bars
Woods GBC box blade
Woods 40" tiller
Woods lrc60 landscape rake

FEL: The fel works well and is easy to get on and off. It does lack power and lift height to a certain degree over my old machine. When working with compacted or wet dirt, I am noticing that biting in and backing up slightly allow the fel to pick up a full bucket without running out of steam. It just doesn't have the breakout force that I was accustomed to but works well once you adjust to it. It is awfully fast acting as well . With filled bars the bx is very stable, though a box on the back increases stabilty. I moved 9 yards of wet manure 150' onto the garden beds and tilled it in in under 2 hours across a decent slope. Low and slow was the way to go. Used to take me all day with the old machine and a Troybilt tiller.
Mowing: The bx 54"mmm has really impressed me with its cutting quality. I have a Dixson ZTR and am considering selling it as the bx gives a better cut and better hill mowing capability. For those who remember my early posts, mowing on hills was a big concern for me. I finally tried it on my worst slope last night and I can even STOP IT on the middle of the slope with no slip at all (WOW! /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif). This compares to sliding down the hill with the Dixson and a Snapper rider. I do have to belt up (I do anyway) or I would have a hard time staying in the seat but the machine performed flawlessly. I think they should call it the billy goat!
Box blading: The bx and box blade combo really work well. After getting the top link/scarifer adjustments squared away I found that the bx wil move some serious dirt. I re-contoured my old garden plot (about 60' x 70'), some established lawn, and made some new beds. The bx will pull the box without much problem until the box was full with extra dirt loading up under the rear of the machine. The only time I experienced any problem was when I set the scarifers all the way down and shortened the top link too much. I'd fill the box in 10' and bog the machine down (dummy newbie operator problem, not the bx). The box gave a good cut and getting a good finish grade was pretty easy, though feathering the 3p lift takes some practice. This is on well compacted clay soil with some large rocks in it. The Woods box is nicely made and has a good paint finish. The only concern I had was that the top link pin holes are 13/16" diameter and the head of a standard top link pin almost went through the pin opening. Called the dealer and he checked with Woods. The large holes are correct. I put 5/8" flatwashers on either side so that the pin would not come off.
Tilling: Tilled some established and new beds with the Woods tiller. Don't worry about overpowering the bx; it wasn't even straining, even in virgin soil with rocks getting chucked out at regular intervals. The Troybilt would beat the heck out of me trying to get new beds started.
No experience with the rake yet but I am getting the gauge wheels for it due to the short wheelbase of the bx. IMHO I feel that with the small machine it will follow contours too much and make finishing harder.
IMHO, the bx is one great all aroud machine. Its a great lawn mower, a capable, though slightly under powered loader, and has more than enough power to pull/run implements. And its built like a brick you know what. I have no regrets about buying this machine whatsoever.
DaveL

I also want to thank all of you for your opinions, suggestions, and all the information that you have compiled on this site. For anyone contemplating biting the bullet and spending some hard earned $$$ on a machine, this site has some of the best information available, and some of the best people around.
Thanks again.
 
   / bx2200 review #2  
Dave,
Thanks for taking the time to write up your experiences. I am sure others will find it helpful. I too am a new BX2200 owner. I love this tractor. I am still using the FEL as way up here I don't need to cut the grass quite yet. I have the 54" MMM and suspect I will be putting it on soon.
I am glad you are please with the quality of cut. I went with the BX partly for that reason. I can sell my Toro Classic 314H and have one less engine to maintain.
How hard or easy is it to mount the mower. The manual makes it look relatively simple. I hope so.

Phil
 
   / bx2200 review #3  
Davel:

You made a good choice. I too have a 2200 and have been impressed with everything it can and will do. My wife has been hinting about learning how to operate the 2200. Hope I don't end up doing all the housework and watching my machine from inside the house! Got to find a place to hide the keys!
 
   / bx2200 review
  • Thread Starter
#4  
PhilNH5,
The only thing that is a pain is getting the pto shaft connected. I've wrestled with it a few times and last week left the deck on when digging out a muddy ditch. Very stupid on my part because I submerged the anti-scalp rollers in mud. Had to take apart, clean and re-lube.
DaveL
 
   / bx2200 review
  • Thread Starter
#5  
Does the 54" mower seem to cause any stair stepping on hills? I know the 60" has the self-balancing system to reduce/eliminate stair-stepping. I think the 54" would be optimal for me, but if there are any stair-stepping problems I probably will just go with the 60".
 
   / bx2200 review
  • Thread Starter
#6  
Dwayne,
Never heard of stair stepping on hills but I guess I understand what you mean. I'm getting an excellent level cut all the way around. And my place is on the side of a hill, so I'd get that problem if anyone did. The 60" deck extends out further of course, and from several posts on this forum I understand it is easier to trim with. The 60" wouldn't fit in some spots around here so I went with the 54". Jbecker if I remember and several others have the 60" and swear by it. Aparently they're both good decks. If you can fit a 60" unit and you have to trim around trees alot, it may be the better way to go.
good luck and happy tractorin',
DaveL
 
   / bx2200 review
  • Thread Starter
#7  
I never heard of stair-stepping either until I saw it explained on the Kubota web site or one of their pamphlets (not sure which). They state that the self-balancing system eliminates this. It made me scared to purchase the 54", because it didn't incorporate this. I had a Simplicity garden tractor with a 54" mower, but it wouldn't cause this, because Simplicity's decks basically roll on the ground with full length rollers.
 
   / bx2200 review
  • Thread Starter
#8  
Dwayne, My property is on a hillside and in places it would be considered very steep; lots of rolls and angulations. I was very worried about uneven cut when I purchased my BX2200. I reasoned that the wider the deck the more the problem would be amplified, so I planned to buy the 54-inch deck over the 60-inch deck. When I posted my proposed BX configuration on TBM I received a lot of feedback from TBNers that I should go with the 60-inch deck because of the self-leveling feature, because it is made of heaver gauge steel and that uneven cut would not be an issue. I took their advice and I am amazed at the quality of cut. No stair stepping and no scalping.

If you have the room to maneuver a 60-inch deck, I would go with it. It’s not that much wider (3 inches each side) and it sure is nice to have a little more overhang when trimming near flower beds and shrubs.

John
 
   / bx2200 review #9  
Thank you for the well written report! Lots of good info to show my wife /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif

KC
 
   / bx2200 review #10  
I agree that the BX loader is rather weak. The loader I built for my old Simplicity puts it to shame, it could easily lift 1,500 lbs., not bad for a "garden tractor". Compare it to a comparable sized machine like the Dig-It which lifts 1,700 lbs. the BX loader is way under powered. The BX hydraulic system pressure it set too low (1850 psi), it should be at least 2000 psi which would give the loader more power(it could also use larger lift cylinders). The BX is built like a tank, too bad Kubota isn't taking advantage of it....
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

Kubota SVL95-2s (A50120)
Kubota SVL95-2s...
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
2012 Ram 4500 Versalift TEL29N 29ft Bucket Truck (A50323)
2012 Ram 4500...
2021 Toyota Corolla LE Sedan (A50324)
2021 Toyota...
2011 Ford F-250 Ez Dumper Dump Truck (A50323)
2011 Ford F-250 Ez...
2018 CHEVROLET 1500 SINGLE CAB TRUCK (A51406)
2018 CHEVROLET...
 
Top