AKKAMAAN
Veteran Member
Just what needed straightened out? What did you say different?
Sorry J_J I didn't want point you out, you did it your self....
There is some very good posts about this....I liked that old thread Kennyd referred to....Oldnslo and mmurphy gave some graet input, and I just wanted to give my input....and your are "about" right about the "doubled" flow to the capped end.....
But I just cant agree with this...QUOTE:"....the pressure is reduced about 1/2, therefore, less force in regen..."
The pressure wont be halfed when regen, it will actually be higher than no-regen....because the net effective cylinder area will be the same as the rod area...The less available pushing force will be caused by the reduced, net effective, piston area (rod cross area) AND the PRV setting.
if rod diameter is 50% (1/2) of the bore, pressure will become 4 times higher to move the load.... 33% (1/3) >>9 times, 70.8%(2:1 ratio)>>2times ...etc etc
regen at 2:1 ratio, will give us a cylinder with the same force and the same speed in both extend retract...good to think about when designing a one cylinder steering......
I have had hydraulic students in front of me for 20+ years, so I am used to, listen with "the students ear".... and that means that if I am are trying to explain/teach something for someone, that do not know anything in the subject...I only get ONE chance to say it right....unless I correct my self....