I've had both tile and LVP. The tile I had was the plank look. 5-8" or so wide by 30" or so long. The LVP is what is in our new house and was chosen based on budget.
Other than the cost, there was nothing that I did not like about the tile for a hard surface. After a year of living on the LVP there could be a case to be made that it's slightly less uncomfortable to walk on the LVP than the tile, in no way comfortable though. I don't want to walk on either for any length of time without house shoes. They both hurt my feet and legs.
I can not stand the noise the LVP makes when walking on it. It has almost a hollow sound if there is any area at all with even the tiniest void between the floor and the LVP. With a Visqueen vapor barrier under it, there are very few places that it's really tight to the floor. It doesn't move in any way that you would notice, it just sounds bad. There are a couple of low places in my slab and it's really noticeable in those places. It does seem to be a lot better in that regard upstairs where it's directly on the wood subfloor.
As for the scratching. We are out in the country, we have dirt, rocks, and small pets. None of that has scratched the LVP. But, dining chairs, couches, and tables sliding has put surface scratches in it. We put felt stick on glides under all the furniture and that seems to have cured the issue though.
I would for sure pick LVP over wood or laminate flooring. Literally every person I know that has wood or laminate has had to replace some or all of it in the last 2 years due to water damage. Whether it was up against an exterior door where water was tracked in over the years or due to a leaking kitchen appliance, it only takes a little bit of water to ruin it.
I don't regret installing LVP. But if I had unlimited money I probably would have rather had the plank tile if I could have found a similar finish. Though the LVP does match really well with the wood we have in the house.