And when lots of high efficiency bulbs get used to save power, the power company wants to raise rates to make up the difference in income.
Bruce
Not only for higher efficiency, solar power has them worried too. Their revenue stream/strategy is getting out-dated.
The Institute for Energy Research reports solar represent 0.3% of all energy produced in the US. Why would that worry any power company?
'Growing fast' is spin, e.g., from 2011 to 2013 solar energy as a percentage of total US energy produced tripled. Fast growth. Yes. Important? It went from 0.1% to 0.3%.Because it is growing rapidly in residential use. Grid-tied systems can cut your monthly net use to zero or even negative kWh but in the same month you can draw heavy loads overnight, AC for hot days, etc.
If you are billed on net use, but the utility still needs to meet your peak demands, that isn't what most utility billing strategies are set up for. They are already shifting toward higher monthly service/connection fees versus usage.
'Growing fast' is spin, e.g., from 2011 to 2013 solar energy as a percentage of total US energy produced tripled. Fast growth. Yes. Important? It went from 0.1% to 0.3%.
Spin? As far as the impact on utilities, you don't seem to understand the grid-tied dynamic at work: meet peak demands with lower revenue. Every solar kilowatt is dinging them.
My main gripe is that they always have '40 watt equivalent' and we mainly use 100 watt incandescent.lighting.