dmccarty
Super Star Member
To be fair to the US Education system, it is hard to teach many subjects to any depth. There is only so much time in 12 years.
And a good portion of the 12 years is just learn'n to read, rite, and cipher'n. 

In college I was waiting to see a History Prof and I noticed another Prof had a bulletin board. Not one of those fancy computer BBS but a real cork bulletin board.

So I went over to read what was on the board...
The Prof was a Greek/Roman Humanities teacher and he had a list of test questions from the 20 or 30s. The purpose was to show how little we learn about the Greek/Roman Classic's anymore. Now I took this to mean we were just a bunch of dumb slackers.
In the 20th Century the amount of human knowledge has increased at an gigantic rate. My grand parents were born when people still had to ride horses for daily transportation but they lived to see faster the sound airplanes, planes that could file around the world in a day, and the man on the moon. Prior to this there was not much difference in human knowledge and lifestyle between my great grandparents and their great grandparents. What has happened in the last 100 years is mind bending.
Back in the day one could focus on the Classics because there was not that much else to learn.
Look at how much science as advanced. In Franklin's day he was known as Natural Philosopher which was a person who today would specialize in physics, biology, zoology, etc. In Ben's day there just was not enough knowledge for specilization. And a wee bit of time has passed to add more to what we have to learn in history. While I might not know Latin, Greek or French I am fluent in at least a half dozen computer languages.
For that old Humanities Prof that would not count for much. 




I think in High school I had one or maybe two semesters in US History. Another one or two semesters in "World History." How can you teach at any depth the History of the World?
And honestly what is a tenth grader more interested? US History or the cute girl sitting next to him?

Also as a teenager much of what is said in history classes is very subtle. One just does not have the life experience to know that signing the Declaration of Independence could me the loss of your land, house, family and/or life. Ben Franklin did not loose much wealth from the war but he lost his son. Not to death in battle but because Ben's son stayed loyal to the King. I think they talked once after the colonies split with the UK. This was very painful for Franklin since his first born son and his namesake died of Smallpox. And Franklin blamed himself for the death since he knew that he should inoculate his son with Cowpox to build up immunity to Smallpox. But Franklin was too busy with his business and politics to have the inoculation done and his son caught the pox and died.
Then Franklin lost his other son to Politics....
Later,
Dan
In college I was waiting to see a History Prof and I noticed another Prof had a bulletin board. Not one of those fancy computer BBS but a real cork bulletin board.
The Prof was a Greek/Roman Humanities teacher and he had a list of test questions from the 20 or 30s. The purpose was to show how little we learn about the Greek/Roman Classic's anymore. Now I took this to mean we were just a bunch of dumb slackers.
In the 20th Century the amount of human knowledge has increased at an gigantic rate. My grand parents were born when people still had to ride horses for daily transportation but they lived to see faster the sound airplanes, planes that could file around the world in a day, and the man on the moon. Prior to this there was not much difference in human knowledge and lifestyle between my great grandparents and their great grandparents. What has happened in the last 100 years is mind bending.
Back in the day one could focus on the Classics because there was not that much else to learn.
I think in High school I had one or maybe two semesters in US History. Another one or two semesters in "World History." How can you teach at any depth the History of the World?
And honestly what is a tenth grader more interested? US History or the cute girl sitting next to him?
Also as a teenager much of what is said in history classes is very subtle. One just does not have the life experience to know that signing the Declaration of Independence could me the loss of your land, house, family and/or life. Ben Franklin did not loose much wealth from the war but he lost his son. Not to death in battle but because Ben's son stayed loyal to the King. I think they talked once after the colonies split with the UK. This was very painful for Franklin since his first born son and his namesake died of Smallpox. And Franklin blamed himself for the death since he knew that he should inoculate his son with Cowpox to build up immunity to Smallpox. But Franklin was too busy with his business and politics to have the inoculation done and his son caught the pox and died.
Then Franklin lost his other son to Politics....
Later,
Dan