I hesitate to post to this thread because I think that the amount of dialogue that Ramon's complaints have generated is already excessive. For me, it comes down to this:
Non-commercial CUT users are (at least if they're like me /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif ) generally more interested in the ability of their machine to do the jobs they anticipate than they are in how "high performance" or how fast they can get the work done.
For a commercial operator, my
B7800 would probably be considered "to small" or "underpowered" and thus inefficient for anything but pretty small jobs. But I'm happy as a clam with it because I'm not being paid by the job, I'm not in a hurry to get on to the next job and I'm not too concerned about how fast I can get done and I certainly didn't want to spend $10-20K more for a machine that, admittedly, could do the work in bigger and faster bites.
I think that a commercial operator, or a property owner concerned with speed and "high performance" has the responsibility to make his concerns known to the dealer BEFORE buying and to test the ability of the machines he is considering to deliver the performance he demands.
Now, if Ramon told his dealer what he expected, and claims either that he was mislead, or dissuaded from testing the tractors out for himself, then I am wholly sympathetic to him. Otherwise, I don't understand how he can expect the dealer to have simply assumed some performance expectation on his part that he didn't express until afterwards.
Finally, its pretty obvious to anyone who does even cursory "homework" before buying that the lower end models in each tractor line (BX, B, L and Ms for Kubota) tend to have lower horsepower in relation to their weight while the biggest models tend to the converse. The trade-offs between wheelbase/stability/traction on the one hand, and power/torque/working capacity on the other are obvious. Choosing the right mix for the customer is up to the customer as long as he hasn't been misled and has the opportunity to make an intelligent decision. And the other side of that is that once made, the customer is responsible for, and gets to live with, the decision.
Maybe I've misread all this stuff, but so far I don't get the sense that Ramon was defrauded and I do get the sense that he got what he chose but decided, afterwards, that it wasn't what he wanted. Ramon, if I have misunderstood what happened here I certainly mean no offense.