Comparison: model 1872 to GT2554

   / Comparison: model 1872 to GT2554
  • Thread Starter
#31  
I actually have an Ingersoll 446 for snow blowing with the shift/speed by hand and doesnt bother me at all... guess its what ever you get used to. The 2550 I gave it a good work out today and I do like the foot pedals... my cub 7235 is somewhat the same so its already normal for me. So for preference either one is a good choice for me!!! Just wish the 2550 had a little more umph in reverse though... for mowing it would be fine but for backing up a loaded sweeper in loose soil to dump it can hang easily as there is no momentum to carry.

Pull back on the "forward" pedal and you will get a lot more speed in reverse. I'm gonna add a knob on top of the "reverse" pedal to effectively get more throw out of it or see if the lever can be bent upward more..

I wish the brake and forward pedal were on opposite sides however.
 
   / Comparison: model 1872 to GT2554 #33  
After seeing the pics on the other posts, The 1872 is much more tractor compared to a 2500 series.
I can go either way on the Hydro controls. I think they went to foot controls to make operating the tractor more "carlike". They use this as a selling point as well.

Michael
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2017 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV (A55853)
2017 Chevrolet...
UNUSED INDUSTRIAS AMERICA R2232X 12' DISC HARROW (A57192)
UNUSED INDUSTRIAS...
2015 FREIGHTLINER M2 TANDEM AXLE 24FT FLATBED (A57880)
2015 FREIGHTLINER...
UNUSED WOLVERINE MSG-11-44W 44" HYD STUMP GRAPPLE (A57193)
UNUSED WOLVERINE...
JCT 48" HYD TRENCHER (A52706)
JCT 48" HYD...
2018 INTERNATIONAL 4300 SBA 4X2 26' BOX TRUCK (A57192)
2018 INTERNATIONAL...
 
Top