Gary Fowler
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Messages
- 11,917
- Location
- Bismarck Arkansas
- Tractor
- 2009 Kubota RTV 900, 2009 Kubota B26 TLB & 2010 model LS P7010
That was my point exactly, trying to carry all that compressed gas to run an engine. It would have to be really high pressure on a full tank to be able to get any volume at all. Take a 240 cu ft compressed gas tank that is over 5 feet high and 8" in diameter (approx. dont need someone to look it up and post figures that is if 59" tall etc). Anyway those tanks are quite heavy and to get any range at all would require lots of them even at 70/30 split, you are talking liquid vs vapor ratio.
Liquid storage would be the only way to go on that. As for problematic, shouldnt be any different that storing liquid oxygen, argon, nitrogen. Any pressure releases just route them to a stack above the truck and it floats away due to lighter than air weight.
We have over abundance of natural gas but no good way to use it in vehicles without converting it.
The best way as far as user convenience would be to convert it to diesel and then just pump it in the tank of any diesel vehicle. You would still have the same CO and gases released via standard diesel engines when doing that. I guess the whole thing is trying to decrease air pollution but they are going about it bassakwards.
Liquid storage would be the only way to go on that. As for problematic, shouldnt be any different that storing liquid oxygen, argon, nitrogen. Any pressure releases just route them to a stack above the truck and it floats away due to lighter than air weight.
We have over abundance of natural gas but no good way to use it in vehicles without converting it.
The best way as far as user convenience would be to convert it to diesel and then just pump it in the tank of any diesel vehicle. You would still have the same CO and gases released via standard diesel engines when doing that. I guess the whole thing is trying to decrease air pollution but they are going about it bassakwards.