So, SkyPup,I've read the post from before and the recent postings here and basicly I believe we're concentrating on arguing different points,while we agree on the final outcome. Wether sulfer is a lubricant or not, the removal of it creates a less lubricated diesel fuel. Bottom line, the lubricity has to be restored with some sort of additive,assumably at the refinery. Sulfer IS the major cause of diesel poloution, it must be removed for us to evolve into developing a diesel market in the U.S. This is the reason for the ULSD regulations comming down the pike before '07. With this said, I think we can all agree. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
I have personally used the fuel additives in my Powerstroke and have seen a noticable difference in idle quality, performance and fuel economy. Now depending on where you are in the country and what fuel you use, your results may differ. However the cost of the additive factored into the fuel fill up, I pay less per mile for diesel. The additive gives me on average 1.5mpg increase, driving typically 80mph on the highway. I will continue to run it,even in my tractor, with or without ULSD. Its cheap assurance.
The future does look bright for diesel vehicles. All the manufacturers are waiting for this. Everyone, even VW is experiencing difficulties here in the states due to the fuel. Once this is addressed, we'll have to address the public's impression of diesel vehicles.When you talk diesel the American public automaticly thinks early '80s when you had nasty Mercedes, GM's, Fords, VW's,BMW's, etc smoking, dripping and breaking down left and right. You couldnt even follow one on the road without getting a sheen of oil on your windshield. No one wants that again. No offence intended to those that own these vehicles, I'm sure you too could admit this wasnt our finest hour.