OP
larboc
Silver Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2013
- Messages
- 233
- Location
- hancock, MI
- Tractor
- John Deere 4300, Deere 455, Ariens GT17, Cub Cadet O, Wheelhorse 50
The hookup is EXACTLY the same as the 72" deck running on the F-932 and F-935 front mount mowers. Two gauge wheels on the front of the mower set the front ride height and the tractor's front wheels set the rear ride height on the deck. Two extended arms push the mower deck along and can pick it up. You need to hang a front pto shaft and bearing (same setup as the front snowblower) because a shaft from the mid-pto to the deck is too long and will whip and self destruct at 2100 rpm and could also have some interference problems depending on what tires you use.
You could (theoretically) run it from a mount on the loader arms, but then would need a telescoping front pto shaft. Run the loader in float on the valve.
Once you have/get a front mower, nothing else will do. Start with looking at pics from an F-935, Its just two control arms, some beefier front gauge wheels and the extended drive shaft. If you run it from your mid-pto, no change in gearbox is needed. Some guys have run a front mower off of the rear 540 gearbox using an underbelly shaft and belt drive. That takes a gear set change withinin the same gearbox casting.
I've seen the front pto mounts, bearings and shaft in kits sold periodically on eBay, usually before snow season. Cleaning the deck and sharpening blades on a deck you can lift up in your face is just like they say sliced bread became.
Ahh ha, excellent idea to look at the f-93x!
I should have been clearer, I already have the front pto and lift cylinder for my snow blower and broom so the spud shaft is there and I have the lift cylinder.
The only snafu I'm seeing so far is that the gearbox on the MMM is offset to the right side (wrt drivers position) but the front PTO is centered. The F-935 deck is opposite. Looking at it in the yard it looks like it would put quite a bit of angle on the u-joints and put the driveshaft in the way of the mounts. With some modification to the deck I think I could move the gearbox closer to center with a couple brackets welded to the deck and repositioning the tensioner idler. I'm thinking this might be worth pursuing since I've heard nothing but bad things about the 72" MMM on these tractors because they don't lift high and they are a bear to take on and off.
I also have none of the parts to put it under the tractor and the front PTO kit's bracket doesn't look to have provisions for the stock front MMM draft link.
I'll probably be firing up the plasma and welder tonight as the backyard is getting a little long.