</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Consider this one point, while the Kubota may be assembled here from parts made in Japan, the profits go back to Japan. Depending on the model, a JD may be assembled there or here, but the profits come back to a company based in Illinois and are dispursed through that community. Last time I checked, Illinois was still part of the USA. )</font>
Not so fast.
Kubota Corp (NYSE:KUB) along with John Deere (NYSE

E) are both publicly traded companies. Profits may be returned to the parent company in their home country but the profits are not necessarily put back into the local economy. I doubt if more than a very, very small fraction of JD's profits went back into the local Moline community, just as I assume that only a small fraction of Kubota's profits went back into the local Osaka community.
In fact, as global companies, profits are used either to improve the company by means of extended R&D, cash for a rainy day, new plants and distribution facilities, etc., all happening worldwide. Furthermore, both companies pay dividends to their shareholders which come out of the profits.
JD is no better or no worse than any other company in this global society when it comes to having home grown products. They get the products and components to build those products from wherever it makes corporate sense and corporate sense usually means "best bang for the buck". As a stockholder I wouldn't have it any other way.