megotatractor
Veteran Member
Hi, would appreciate some help, not sure if this is the correct forum.
I have an old Craftsman heavy duty 1/2" electric impact driver that doesn't quite work the way I would expect. I think the cord has been replaced at some time and repairs were made to the hammer part a few years ago but to my knowledge (I inherited this a few years ago) it has never operated properly . This tool hammers merrily along forever and fails to loosen nuts that I can loosen with a large enough wrench. However the goofy thing is perfectly capable of overtightening a nut to the point of breakage with incredible efficiency and speed. It has a fwd/rev switch and I wonder if this is wired backwards and if so if that would effect the hammer? Or is the hammer backwards somehow? Also I would assume that "fwd" would mean "clockwise" and "rev" would mean "counterclockwise"???? or is the switch wired backwards because it operates the other way around; fwd=counterclockwise, rev=clockwise? the tool is about 30 years old and lightly used but doesn't work quite right. Any insights would be helpful, thanks.
I have an old Craftsman heavy duty 1/2" electric impact driver that doesn't quite work the way I would expect. I think the cord has been replaced at some time and repairs were made to the hammer part a few years ago but to my knowledge (I inherited this a few years ago) it has never operated properly . This tool hammers merrily along forever and fails to loosen nuts that I can loosen with a large enough wrench. However the goofy thing is perfectly capable of overtightening a nut to the point of breakage with incredible efficiency and speed. It has a fwd/rev switch and I wonder if this is wired backwards and if so if that would effect the hammer? Or is the hammer backwards somehow? Also I would assume that "fwd" would mean "clockwise" and "rev" would mean "counterclockwise"???? or is the switch wired backwards because it operates the other way around; fwd=counterclockwise, rev=clockwise? the tool is about 30 years old and lightly used but doesn't work quite right. Any insights would be helpful, thanks.
Last edited: