Creek advice

   / Creek advice #21  
Grant,
Indeed thats good news.
Glad to read your state willing to work very close w/ you and no <font color=red>red<font color=red> <font color=black> tape.


Thomas..NH /w3tcompact/icons/wink.gif
 
   / Creek advice #22  
That seems like pretty good news.

Officials do get touchy about their fish, and it's good to keep on the good side of officials. Yesterday we went to town council meeting about proposed highway improvements. I noticed that local fisheries (Ottawa River) were marked on a map of the proposed improvements. The highway doesn't run especially close to the highway in the area, and the fish still get considered. I suppose that's a good thing although it may seem a pain when you're just trying to do a little property maintenance.

We went to the meeting because one of the proposals would have rerouted a township road along a side property line at our camp. We made some noise about it last fall, and now there are four, instead of one, alternatives. The fish got considered and so did we. I'm happy for all of us.
 
   / Creek advice
  • Thread Starter
#23  
I wanted to give everyone an update on this project. The fisheries biologist came out today and took a look at the creek. I was impressed with her friendliness and professionalism, which I haven't always appreciated in other state employees.
She suggested that the "ultimate" way to fix the problem is also the most expensive, to the tune of up to $50,000. Ouch. That's the bad news. The way to do this is to construct several rock(big riprap) jettys out into the creek anchored or "keyed" back in trenches along the bank. She said this approach can actually build back the bank with the water collecting silt etc. along the jetties over time. The jetties have to be put in properly and downstream enough that the current doesn't cut back and do the same thing as before, just downstream a little.

The good news is that she thinks the bank might be stabilizing. It has probably worsened over the past 10 years by a channelization project for the bridge just upstream plus development upstream too. She was very sympathetic about my not having that kind of money to spend and suggested monitoring it with stakes or t-posts driven near the edge and planting a bunch of native willows or cottonwoods along the top bank and the bank that has slid down. She gave me some good ideas about stabilizing gullies too. The trees won't hold the bank if it really decides to cut loose through there but it's worth trying while I watch it to see how much it's going to stabilize. I can plant a whole lot of seedlings at 25 for 4 bucks. By the way, the jetty project requires an engineer to design and 3 permits. One is a type of flood permit for the engineer to verify that your project won't convert someone else downstream from a 100 yr flood plain to a 5 yr flood plain or something similar.

Fishman, the biologist, Pam Lanigun, knows your friend Brian Todd. He gives trainings to fisheries people like her. I asked her to tell him hello from you.

18-32934-tractorsig2.JPG
 
   / Creek advice #24  
I seem to have read something somewhere where during low water that some people have buried stumps upside down in the banks, sometimes with cables and cement blocks attached to hold them until mother nature takes over. This has more of an ability to catch silt and promote fish habitat and then some old erosion methods of "armoring" the sides with cement etc., which is probably now illegal anyway.

Oh, and you can have all of my stumps for free, but you have to travel to Washington. I can haul you one small one tied to the back of my motorhome, I'd love an excuse to go back to the old homestead outside Rocky Comfort. Geez, that's what I should name my property here in Washington, ROCKY COMFORT. (glacier left me a goldmine in worthless rocks)

If you have found a fisheries or DNR person that you can deal with and wants to help solve the problem in different ways, you're half the way there.

My dealings with state agencies have been for the most part about as fun and fruitful as getting stuck in a quag.

For some reason, our state has the policy that if YOU do something, no matter how minor that causes silt, no matter HOW minor to hit the water YOU should be stomped on.

OK, fair enough, but if mother nature causes a slide that dumps tons and tons into the water, no problem, it's N A T U R A L, that's OK.

The catch to this is that when you see something you KNOW is going to happen, erosion wise, and approach them with the potential, and possible solutions to PREVENTING IT, they don't seem to be interested.

Talk about locking the barn door after the mud falls in the bay, they just sit and look at the open gate and let the horse run out. (oops mixing metaphors!)

I've had a couple of geologists spend half a day with me on some property I have and have learned a lot. That might be one thing to do before proceeding further. If you have in hand suggestions from people who should know it will help you if you get tangled with the state.

Some countys/states (all?) operate in a way that requires them to not grant any permits for anyone that actually asks, but don't do anything about anything that people are doing WITHOUT permits.

Maybe you could see what permits are necessary to build a "FENCE".

Put your fence inbound a little ways from the problem. Your fence posts should sit on a block of concrete about 4 feet by 4 feet, and your posts should be about 4 feet apart. You aren't doing ANYTHING to the shoreline, you are building a FENCE. Sure it will erode up to your fence, but will stop there. I know this may sound silly, but things like this have been done. One fire department in this state had a comment on their website about the current phony "smog" bans on fires in certain areas PERMANENTLY when in some cases people have no neighbors and have never been in a carbon monoxide "non attainment" area.

The website talks about the legality of "recreational" fires.

Apparently you can have a recreational fire if it is intended as a recreational fire. If your intent is to dispose of land clearing brush it is illegal. The website says that the intent of the fire determines it's legality.

Kind of like your problem. If your intent is to build a fence, it's OK, if your intent is to do ANYTHING to the creek...NO WAY.

In my area almost all of the "creeks" have been restricted by the fisheries department. This includes "creeks" that are only creeks along the road when it rains, and go away when it stops raining.

It's NOT OK to do anything to your ditch without all kinds of permits (routinely ignored). However, it is of course OK to let the fluids from cars run into the ditch. The county has a heck of time with about a third of it's drainage ditches from these restrictions. I often wonder if people that write some of these ordinances have even seen a fish or seen where fish live. ,

Good luck with your project.
 
   / Creek advice #25  
Grant,
Indeed its nice to have the state work w/you and to show up so quickly.
$50,000.oo for repaires..OUCH is right. /w3tcompact/icons/crazy.gif
I was wondering if you planted trees and in years to come the ground became soggy do to a rainy year w/ winds,wouldn't the trees loosen up the bank from the wind.
Have you consider something like ground hemlocks to hold your bank in place,for they have tough root system.

Did this lady say it was okay to straighten the creek for the flow of the water w/out permits,and push new fill back into place where the bank wash away than seed it in etc...

Thomas..NH /w3tcompact/icons/wink.gif
 
   / Creek advice
  • Thread Starter
#26  
Thomas,
I don't know the answer to the trees and roots loosening up the bank in a windstorm. I guess it's possible but usually what you see at least around here is the creek itself does the damage because of higher water volumes cutting it deeper and faster and it loses it's natural ability to flood. They recommend at least a 50 foot buffer zone of trees and vegetation on a creek like this.
I didn't ask her about the straightening idea but I get the feeling it would probably require a permit too. I would need the cooperation of my across creek neighbor to straighten that one bend and I doubt I could get it. I think I'd also have to pour in a lot of rock to do that, the way the creek is configured. If I went farther upstream near the bridge and straightened like Richard did on his creek, making a bypass of this entire loop, I'd have to cut a big trench and would sacrifice too much land. This configuration would also make the water run through there like a log ride at an amusement park. There are definite tradeoffs in all these approachs. I'll content myself to plant some trees, monitor it and see if I can find somone who could do put in the jetties for a reasonable price if I need to go that way in the future. I just remembered yesterday that I know some people who have had a lot of similar experience fixing levees along the Grand river in central Missouri so I'm going to see if they might want to travel over here and do some work in the future. This would be a small job compared with the stuff they usually do shoring up along the wild Grand.

18-32934-tractorsig2.JPG
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2016 Ford Escape SUV (A50324)
2016 Ford Escape...
2025 12V Diesel Pump and Hose (A50324)
2025 12V Diesel...
Quick Attach Pallet Forks (A47384)
Quick Attach...
2020 KENWORTH T680 TANDEM AXLE SLEEPER (A51219)
2020 KENWORTH T680...
Unused Delta Crash Attenuators (A49461)
Unused Delta Crash...
2014 AUTOCAR EXPEDITOR GARBAGE TRUCK (A51219)
2014 AUTOCAR...
 
Top