The WSJ has had a couple of articles that hit on DST.
A few weeks ago there was an article about how power companies are seeing earlier use of power starting around 5:00am. This is about an hour earlier than what has been historically been seen. It also has nothing to do with DST. The power demand is getting earlier all year round.
The other article was about DST, who wants it, who benefits, and does it save energy. Most studies according to the article show no savings of energy. I really don't see how it could. I turn on the lights in the house day or night so DST does not change my energy usage one way or the other. The companies that make money are the ones envolved in sports, golf/tennis ball makers, owners of golf/tennis clubs, etc.
There was an English Dude just prior to WWI that wanted to implement DST so people could enjoy sporting activities with the extra day but his idea was shot down by Parliment. Then during WWI the Germans implemented DST and the English followed.
Just leave the time alone as far as I'm concerned. It does not help anyone I have ever known. I used to stand outside waiting for a bus. What is the big deal? I used to cross a major four lane road before the crossing guard showed up for work and I did it in no/low light in the 5th and 6th grade. I see very few kids walking or riding a bike to school anymore so this is really a non issue in the areas I have lived in.
Later,
Dan