Re: Decision Made!/tire ballast
Rob, see my response to Boondox.
What are you guys, wimps? /w3tcompact/icons/wink.gif
So it might be a little "bumpy" in your tires freeze,... they'll still be HEAVY!!
Re. "Rimguard": I have the specs (but not handy),... I called and spoke with the mfr., and then went with the (impressive, I thought) info to my local "Big"-tire dealer.
They were not overly impressed, because the stuff is full-volume, and would have to be "tank-stored/transported" to the "fill" site. Now they can just take the calcium "concentrate", in a pick-up truck with-a-pump, and use on-site water to mix/fill. No "tank-truck" or trailer to deal with/store.
Also, there seems to be a bit of a problem pumping the stuff through the pumps that are ordinarily used for cal-fill.
Once the "Rimguard" is in, though, it sounds like the way-to-go. -- non-toxic, won't freeze, non-corrosive, and about 10#/gal.
I still haven't decided what I'm gonna do about tire ballast.
The Michelin techs, reccomend weights rather than fill,... but the JD manual says use weights AND fill for FEL work.
Ballast "aft" like on the 3-pt (say a 1000+# box-scraper) adds even MORE weight to the rear than the ballast-wt., because of the weight that is "levered' off of the front axle, which is GOOD when the loader is full, and BAD when it is empty.
I'm still working with figures/weights, trying to decide what I'm gonna do.
I don't want weight when not-desirable (wet-mowing), and I won't mess with bolt-on/remove wheel weights. and CAN'T change filled-tire weight.
Hmnn! /w3tcompact/icons/mad.gif
Larry