OP
marrt
Platinum Member
A few responses:
Down pressure on PT PHD: Good point. And this is significant. On a number of occasions, I noticed the PHD I borrowed from my neighbor had trouble “getting purchase” and down pressure would be a big help. Also, I like the fact I can use a bigger auger on the PT for planting tree and such.
Three implements at once does not offset Quick Attach: Agreed. The only time I can envision this would be a big plus is when I would use the loader and something else (like a middle buster plow to loosen the dirt and then the loader to move it).
PT is less expensive: True, especially for the 422. However, I can currently get a BX2200, FEL, 60” MMM, box blade, and tiller from Carver for $13K. This is about $2K more than the equivalent 425. However, when I add a couple additional implements for the PT, that I already happen to own and can use with the BX, I’m within $1K or so. Still a significant amount by not a tie breaker for me in this instance.
The BX uses small implements that wouldn’t be appropriate if I bought a larger tractor: Not sure this is entirely accurate. I’ve seen a couple of vague comments on this issue but don’t have any specific examples, other than a PHD issue caused by the Auger being too long due to the BX’s “low rider” profile. This of course assumes I would only go up a size or two in tractors.
Snow/Dirt blade is cheaper on the PT: Good point. Unfortunately, I don’t need a blade or pallet forks. Although, frankly, need has never stopped me from buying an implement. /w3tcompact/icons/wink.gif
PT mower better than BX mower: In general, I agree. My only concern is that the BX mower is suspended and should, hypothetically, perform well over rough terrain. I wonder if the PT mower would not cause problems in the same terrain. Not sure as I simply don’t have enough experience with either mower.
Dealer support: I had not made a big deal out of this issue as the PT factory is reasonably close to where I live and, after demoing the product, I am pretty confident I could get parts and quickly fix most issues. Normally, this would be a big concern for me but not in this case.
Ability to easily transport in a truck: Good point. Something I hadn’t considered. Not important to me at this point but maybe in the future.
Diesel engine advantage: I like the diesel engine because I like it. Kinda like the same reason I like the color green. No real logical reason…other than possibly the safety of storing and using diesel over gasoline. Don’t think the longevity issue is that important in this case as both engines will probably out last me. Also, as pointed out, the Kohler is cheap to replace.
Sounds like you would be more comfortable with the BX: Maybe, but I REALLY like the PT. It’s such a great design and is very reasonably priced. If Kubota hadn’t come out with the BX, it would be a very easy decision.
Down pressure on PT PHD: Good point. And this is significant. On a number of occasions, I noticed the PHD I borrowed from my neighbor had trouble “getting purchase” and down pressure would be a big help. Also, I like the fact I can use a bigger auger on the PT for planting tree and such.
Three implements at once does not offset Quick Attach: Agreed. The only time I can envision this would be a big plus is when I would use the loader and something else (like a middle buster plow to loosen the dirt and then the loader to move it).
PT is less expensive: True, especially for the 422. However, I can currently get a BX2200, FEL, 60” MMM, box blade, and tiller from Carver for $13K. This is about $2K more than the equivalent 425. However, when I add a couple additional implements for the PT, that I already happen to own and can use with the BX, I’m within $1K or so. Still a significant amount by not a tie breaker for me in this instance.
The BX uses small implements that wouldn’t be appropriate if I bought a larger tractor: Not sure this is entirely accurate. I’ve seen a couple of vague comments on this issue but don’t have any specific examples, other than a PHD issue caused by the Auger being too long due to the BX’s “low rider” profile. This of course assumes I would only go up a size or two in tractors.
Snow/Dirt blade is cheaper on the PT: Good point. Unfortunately, I don’t need a blade or pallet forks. Although, frankly, need has never stopped me from buying an implement. /w3tcompact/icons/wink.gif
PT mower better than BX mower: In general, I agree. My only concern is that the BX mower is suspended and should, hypothetically, perform well over rough terrain. I wonder if the PT mower would not cause problems in the same terrain. Not sure as I simply don’t have enough experience with either mower.
Dealer support: I had not made a big deal out of this issue as the PT factory is reasonably close to where I live and, after demoing the product, I am pretty confident I could get parts and quickly fix most issues. Normally, this would be a big concern for me but not in this case.
Ability to easily transport in a truck: Good point. Something I hadn’t considered. Not important to me at this point but maybe in the future.
Diesel engine advantage: I like the diesel engine because I like it. Kinda like the same reason I like the color green. No real logical reason…other than possibly the safety of storing and using diesel over gasoline. Don’t think the longevity issue is that important in this case as both engines will probably out last me. Also, as pointed out, the Kohler is cheap to replace.
Sounds like you would be more comfortable with the BX: Maybe, but I REALLY like the PT. It’s such a great design and is very reasonably priced. If Kubota hadn’t come out with the BX, it would be a very easy decision.
