Farmwithjunk
Super Member
First off, I'm not upset at you. What have you done to me?
Secondly, I wasn't commenting exclusively on cameras being used to take pictures of deer, but just people looking at the scenery in general, and MAYBE taking a picture of whatever they see. (We get a lot of that around here)
People spotlighting in what is best described as a semi-urban area is uncalled for, unwelcome by the area residents, ILLEGAL here (apparently we have different laws than your home state)
Next issue.... I don't need to "calm down", nor do I need to re-read anyones post. My reading comprehension is just dandy. You weren't speaking a foriegn language, and I understood the point you are TRYING to make.
And FINALLY, seeing as to how you're closely affiliated with the sport of deer hunting, I'd be particularley careful about DEFENDING (in a broad sense) "hunters" right to offend, irritate, and in some cases, VIOLATE THE RIGHTS of many folks who have no space in their lives for hunters in the first place.
Believe it or not, those "tree huggers" have a vote too.
Don't take this as me "dissing" hunters, hunting, guns, or wildlife oriented sports. I'm a hunter myself. (wild turkey mostly) But just as I was an extreme advocate of MANDATORY HELMET LAWS while I was a motorcyclist, I believe in hunters showing responsible behavior, ESPECIALLY around people who have no use for them.
My favorite "saying" has always been "Perception is greater than reality". If ONE HUNTER makes all the rest look bad, they ARE bad in the eyes of those who would vote against hunters rights.
Secondly, I wasn't commenting exclusively on cameras being used to take pictures of deer, but just people looking at the scenery in general, and MAYBE taking a picture of whatever they see. (We get a lot of that around here)
People spotlighting in what is best described as a semi-urban area is uncalled for, unwelcome by the area residents, ILLEGAL here (apparently we have different laws than your home state)
Next issue.... I don't need to "calm down", nor do I need to re-read anyones post. My reading comprehension is just dandy. You weren't speaking a foriegn language, and I understood the point you are TRYING to make.
And FINALLY, seeing as to how you're closely affiliated with the sport of deer hunting, I'd be particularley careful about DEFENDING (in a broad sense) "hunters" right to offend, irritate, and in some cases, VIOLATE THE RIGHTS of many folks who have no space in their lives for hunters in the first place.
Believe it or not, those "tree huggers" have a vote too.
Don't take this as me "dissing" hunters, hunting, guns, or wildlife oriented sports. I'm a hunter myself. (wild turkey mostly) But just as I was an extreme advocate of MANDATORY HELMET LAWS while I was a motorcyclist, I believe in hunters showing responsible behavior, ESPECIALLY around people who have no use for them.
My favorite "saying" has always been "Perception is greater than reality". If ONE HUNTER makes all the rest look bad, they ARE bad in the eyes of those who would vote against hunters rights.