So far, Congress has been unwilling to codify much in the way of EOs or regs.
Probably because other issues like the economy, borders, Ukraine war, etc are higher up the list than DPF/DEF is in Congress.
We shall see, right? I agree mid terms don’t usually go the way of the current WH occupant, but maybe they will get it passed while majorities remain favorable. Neither of us know.
Most mfgs haven't made separate OTR vehicles for CA emissions in years. They essentially make all of their vehicles comply with the stricter standards. A bunch have already committed to continue to do so.
There are some small engine places that make separate versions for CA.
But the point is, it WAS done for many years, so they can make separate emissions systems for other countries.
If England still wants $10,000 worth of unreliable junk on the ass end of every diesel engine, great. We can put it on for them. Meanwhile the US version gets a muffler and a tailpipe.
It’s also a great opportunity for truck/equipment manufacturers to make more money. Once the emissions equipment is removed, no one will know how much the production price will drop, but you and I both know they won’t pass
all the savings onto the consumer.
It’s a golden opportunity for them to increase profits.
I agree that most of the diesel rules are silly. It just seems easier to get consensus on off-road AG vehicles to be excluded.
Yeah for sure. It also points out the absurdity of making a guy with a small vegetable farm running a small tractor have to pay $10,000 extra to reduce pollution, when pollution levels have already been greatly reduced.
Today’s diesels run very clean. They make much less emissions without the extra equipment.