The Ram Cummins engine brake is rated in horsepower, not back pressure. This can be described as "retarding force". It's not rated in back pressure or drive pressure. It says right on the gauge, on the dash, how many horsepower the brake is producing in retarding force. This is not the same thing as turbo boost. The Cummins turbo has a sliding collar that closes off the exhaust for braking. Boost is produced by engine exhaust, under power, spinning up the turbo. Braking force is produced by closing off the exhaust and letting the engine act as a pump that produces much higher cylinder pressure on the exhaust stroke when there is no fuel being injected. This makes the engine work against a very restrictive exhaust. It is also used at idle when warming up in cold weather to make the engine work harder while idling, to warm up faster. Every upshift, 2nd through 6th includes locking the torque converter. This means the brake can be engaged anytime the RPM is over 1200, in any gear but 1st. In second it is so powerful they warn against using it in anything but perfect traction and I've had mine skid the rear tires on wet pavement. Modern trannys not only have a newer torque converter (TC) lockup strategy for efficiency, as compared to years ago in the 48RE, but it's also to accommodate the engine brake in a very seamless way since the TC must be locked for the brake to work properly. Older Chrysler trannys, anything before the last generation of the 48RE, were not rated for engine brakes because of the reverse thrust on the main shaft it produced. They simply had a bronze thrust bearing instead of the later roller thrust bearing. Besides that, they had no interface to the engine brake unless you grounded the lockup clutch terminal on the main transmission plug (his may have been part of the brake controller in aftermarket engine brakes, I don't know). This grounding was done by a bunch of guys, me included, who added a switch to manually lock the TC. We called it the "mystery switch".