</font><font color="blue" class="small">( they do not have the smarts to understand )</font>
I was one of many, a majority, who voted to close Rancho Seco nuclear plant, the only one shut down by a vote of its customers so far as I know.
The last straw for this econut was when it was revealed that radioactivity leaving the premises via a small seasonal creek was about 20 times larger than publically stated. The biophysicists responsible for monitoring runoff were cynically reporting their one-hour observation as the 24 hour quantity because what they saw in an hour nearly exceeded the 24 hour federal standard.
My concern was partly biology but more important, a lack of belief overall that anyone there knew what they were doing. While another 3 Mile Island was unlikely, that was caused by ignorant operators and Rancho Seco seemed to be full of them.
The ongoing controversy that led to the referendum was Rancho Seco's poor uptime. I don't think it ever ran during peak demand season. It had overhaul after overhaul without solving some fundamental reliability flaws. Nuclear-powered electricity, including the waste disposal costs that continue today years after the shutdown, cost far more than other sources.
At the time it felt like riding the Titantic all the way down - there was no good news in sight, just more plans to spend far more money before it could meet licensing standards and get back on line. No one was optomistic it would run very long this time before some new unexpected failure like it always did.
I don't think it was the ratepayers who lacked smarts, rather the nuclear energy engineers who sold this turkey to us revealed themselves to be incompetent fools.
Not in my back yard, thanks.