DK45 and KL1590 loader

[KiotiJohn]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( By the way . do you wear Kioti orange underwear ? I never in my life knew anyone that knows as much about Kioti's as you do . I bet you sleep with a owners manual !
I'll be glad to get back to the ranch and put a little time on the old tractor .
Big Al )</font>
Welcome home Al! I hope you guys had a great trip.
No, I don't wear orange underwear, and I'm sure there are others who know more than I about Kioti, but what I don't know, I find out. Helps that I've done some contract writing for the parent company. Now if I could just get a new DK45S out of them for the cost Kioti pays Daedong, I'd be in heaven!
John

 

[Quickster2]

I just purchased DK45 with Rhino 2409 loader and could not be more pleased. Performance of this combination has suited me well moving manure, trees, gravel, etc. The 2409 does not have the rated capacity of the 1590 nor the self leveling features. I also liked the box frame support of the Rhino. I upgraded from my Yanmar 336D to the DK45 and have never looked back.

 

[rogdan]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( it doesn't roll back far enough and the roll back isn't very strong. )</font> /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
Researching old posts, is this still the case?

 

[KiotiJohn]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Researching old posts, is this still the case? )</font>
From what I understand, a fix was made for this problem and is now in the new 1590 loaders.
John

 

[Donnyj]

There is no problem at all with loader performance on the new DK45S. I personally would like to see a larger bucket on the loader. Deeper, not wider.

 

[gmsssi]

Ditto..............KL451 loader

 

[rogdan]

Thanks all! /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif