Though I did not know of this, I take your word that it is true. It still illustrates, however, that a relatively small impact (when contrasted with the tremendous forces involved in some 200 mph crashes) was enough to kill one of the world's best drivers, and that a properly working seatbelt would have saved him.
I know that a lot goes into engineering the frame, roll cage, etc. for a racing stock car. Still, that illustrates that when all systems work properly, NASCAR drivers coolly walk away from 200 mph crashes. That being the case, it really seems that standard street cars could be engineered to be more crash survivable at normal highway speeds. I know that it would cost more money, but it really seems that it should be possible.
I sometimes wonder what percent of auto fatalities would have survived if the victims had been wearing a helmet. I know it would look geeky, and I've never seen someone wearing a helmet in a car (other than racers), but still, I just wonder what the statistics would be. Bird, I'm sure that you saw a lot of fatalities close up. What would your rough guess be on the percent of fatalities in auto crashes that would have survived if they'd have had a helmet on while in the car?