</font><font color="blue" class="small">( How about a lecture on the sources and differences in the natural gas products....I'm so confused!)</font>
OK, I'll try, although someone like Skypup knows much more about the actual chemistry than I do.
Petroleum liquids and gases consist of a wide spectrum of hydrocarbon-chain molecules. Vastly simplified, these can range from near solids like tar, to heavy, medium, and light crude oil, to gas condensate, and many different constituents in natural gas - principally methane, ethane, propane, and butane. The relative concentrations or percentages of these hydrocarbons in any given reservoir (oil and/or gas field) depends on the thermal history and depth of burial and the timing of when the hydrocarbons migrated into the reservoir. But the important thing is, more than one phase of hydrocarbons almost always exist together in the same reservoir. In other words, yes, many fields produce both oil and natural gas, as well as water. Gravity and hydrodynamic pressure (among other things) will segregate the phases over time, so that it is common (but not universal) to have a field with water on the bottom, oil on top of that, and gas on top of the oil.
The source of all these products is the same in any given sedimentary basin, usually organic shales. Again, what makes the difference between them is the relative amount of "cooking" by the heat and pressure of burial and other tectonic events nearby. All of the gas and oil products are related and many coexist at the same time in the same reservoir. In this regard, the earth itself is a large (but very slow) refinery, breaking down and segregating the various hydrocarbon constituents of crude oil over time.
So, oil and gas are not mutually exclusive substances, but just different densities of the same basic petroleum material.
Crude oil is refined (distilled and/or hydro-cracked) into more distinct useful fractions like lube (motor) oil, diesel, fuel oil, kerosene, jet fuel, gasoline, and etc. Most crude oil has gas fractions in it too, but these are mostly seperated at the well head. Some Propane and other useful gases come from crude oil.
Similarly, raw natural gas must be processed to take out the water, C02, and H2S, and then to seperate it into Methane (what we call natural gas, or CH4) Ethane, Propane, and Butane. The bulk of our Propane comes from this kind of gas processing. Ethane, Propane, and Butane are just the heavier, longer-chain gas molecules that are stripped out of the raw mixed gas from the well.
Again greatly simplified, the rest is just acronyms: LP is Liquid Propane, LPG is liquid Propane and/or liquid Butane, LNG is Liquified Natural Gas (Methane). It is convenient, cheap, and relatively safe to store and transport these gases as liquids and then allow them to vaporize as needed to burn them.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( I know there are gas wells in addition to petroleum wells, and I assume some wells produce both, though it may not be economical to collect both from the same well?)</font>
Depending on the design of the well, it is fairly easy and common to produce both oil and gas from one well, from different portions of the same reservoir, or from different vertical reservoirs in the same well. Usually, you will run a steel tubing string inside the well casing, and pump oil up the inside of the tubing and let gas rise by gravity in the annulus between the tubing and the casing.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Is propane derived from cracking petroleum, or is it isolated from the mixture of gases in natural gas?)</font>
Both, as explained above. Mostly the second way.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Is natural gas mainly methane)</font>
Yes; raw natural gas at the wellhead is about 80% Methane. The natural gas you buy and heat your house with (or the power company burns to generate electricity) is more like 99% Methane.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( and is that why it can be possible to add bio-derived methane to a natural gas supply?)</font>
Yes, a Methane molecule is a Methane molecule, no matter where it comes from.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Lastly, is the new-to-me theory of carbon cycle derived petroleum similar to cold fusion and magnetic water softeners, or is it possible in your view?)</font>
I think you might mean abiogenic (non-biologically-derived) petroleum? The traditional view of hydrocarbon generation by the decay of organic material is part of the Carbon cycle as it is understood and taught today. Some have proposed various theories of abiogenic petroleum generation, but these have yet to be proven successful by the drill bit. Not to say that they couldn't work, just that they have not been proven yet. One thing I like about geology as a science is that there are not many absolutes, and there is lots of room for new ideas. I had college professors who didn't believe in plate tectonics, yet today it is pretty universally accepted. We will have to come up with some new ideas and new technologies to make it through the rest of this century without some drastic upheaval.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Semi-science-literate people want to know.
Chuck
)</font>
They probably got more than they wanted! /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif