SPYDERLK
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2006
- Messages
- 10,330
- Location
- VA
- Tractor
- JD2010, Kubota3450,2550, Mahindra 7520 w FEL w Skid Steer QC w/Tilt Tatch, & BH, BX1500
True.There is a reason that most large Ag tractors now are 4 WD. Loss of Traction even 10% more than a comparable 4 WD tractor will cost you in fuel much more than the cost of the tractor when you consider the thousands of hours farmers put on tractor per year. 200 HP tractors might burn 200+ gallons of fuel per day so even saving 10% = 20 gallons at lets say $3 per gallon (fuel will eventually go back up from the $2.25 per gallon now), so $60 per day. Farm tractors will run at least 180 days per year or more if farmers double crop. So a 50% duty cycle so over $10,000 per year cost difference
,,,I want to make a distinction between loss of traction and the wasted work of pushing soil that happens with running non drive wheels thru soft soil. ... By using a tractor to make its non driven tires "roll" over obstacles one can notice that larger/taller obstacles are obviously pushed, in contrast to being climbed over as a driven tire would do. This has to do with the relative speeds different parts of the tire have wrt earth. The bottom part of the tire has no motion wrt ground and will just glide over a low obstacle. Parts higher on the tire have a forward speed wrt ground and tend to push the obstacle ahead in an attempt to roll over. A driven tire OTOH will actively climb over as opposed to pushing.
Non driven vs driven tires that travel on soft surfaces sink in to a degree and present the same type of contrasting situation. The rolling wheel pushes some soil ahead, a total loss, while the driven wheel climbs up on it and shoves it rearward - much less loss. A 4wd discing a plowed field will go faster and will use less torque than if it is used in 2wd. A savings in fuel and tire and driveline wear.
,,,larry