patrickg
Veteran Member
Brian, Dog training is not all science. I had an aquaintance who raised a few labs to sell to trainers for hunting dogs. He decided to pick a pup for a companion dog for the family as the "buisness dogs" were off limits. He put the pup on his enclosed back porch to paper train it and in case of an accident/miss the carpet would not be involved. When he noticed the pup using the paper he would praise it and if it missed he would rub its nose in it and toss the pup out the window. Labs are real smart and quick learners. After about three of these incidents, the pup, while whining with its tail tucked between its legs and head hanging low would slowly approch the mess, stick his nose in a bit, and then jump out the window.
Now then, about Capt. Kirk's surplus pain collars... I know of a couple folks who "missed" their opportunity to train their dog to a collar-fence as a pup and had penetration problems where the dog would "Crash" the barrier, withstanding a zap or two to get freedom and as has been commented previously and not be motivated to endure it again to get back. In both cases what was successful was the addition of the other type of "Pain" collar in addition to the invisible fence type. Although exact methodology varied, the basic idea was to "manually" zap the dog while he was outside the "fence" so there was no rewarding payoff for "breaking out". The dog learned rather quickly that "busting out" was more uncomfortable than the fence reinforcement shock. The owners had of course turned the manual controlled unit up way higher than the level of the unit that worked in conjunction with the fence. One major difference between the two instances is that one guy turned the fence off while using the manual zapper to punish the dog for being out of bounds to ease getting him back across the line. In the end it worked for both. One was a black lab and the other weimeraner(sp?) The lab was also a barker and ended up with an anti barking electronic pain collar that punished continued barking but not a single bark. That too was highly successful. I'm glad the guy had a large robust dog, some small breeds would have to pull a little wagon to haul all the electronics with batteries.
Patrick
Now then, about Capt. Kirk's surplus pain collars... I know of a couple folks who "missed" their opportunity to train their dog to a collar-fence as a pup and had penetration problems where the dog would "Crash" the barrier, withstanding a zap or two to get freedom and as has been commented previously and not be motivated to endure it again to get back. In both cases what was successful was the addition of the other type of "Pain" collar in addition to the invisible fence type. Although exact methodology varied, the basic idea was to "manually" zap the dog while he was outside the "fence" so there was no rewarding payoff for "breaking out". The dog learned rather quickly that "busting out" was more uncomfortable than the fence reinforcement shock. The owners had of course turned the manual controlled unit up way higher than the level of the unit that worked in conjunction with the fence. One major difference between the two instances is that one guy turned the fence off while using the manual zapper to punish the dog for being out of bounds to ease getting him back across the line. In the end it worked for both. One was a black lab and the other weimeraner(sp?) The lab was also a barker and ended up with an anti barking electronic pain collar that punished continued barking but not a single bark. That too was highly successful. I'm glad the guy had a large robust dog, some small breeds would have to pull a little wagon to haul all the electronics with batteries.
Patrick