Thumbs up for EA, but as to ovrszd input, (not criticism) I agree. Equipment/attachments of this nature will always be abused or pushed to it's limits, and should be designed 40-50% beyond "rating". It appears to me also that there was clearly room for improvment on that cyl. mount. Attachment weight becomes more important as the carrier gets smaller, but another 2 pounds of steel on those mounts is irrelevant.
Again, it's refreshing to so a company "stand up". They are clearly in it for the long game.