Soundguy
Old Timer
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
- Messages
- 51,575
- Location
- Central florida
- Tractor
- RK 55HC,ym1700, NH7610S, Ford 8N, 2N, NAA, 660, 850 x2, 541, 950, 941D, 951, 2000, 3000, 4000, 4600, 5000, 740, IH 'C' 'H', CUB, John Deere 'B', allis 'G', case VAC
I thinkt he turbo cool down and bearing coking might be more of a concern for turbo diesels.. vs turbo gas engines. I have a pyrometer and like to get it down to 300-400 before shutting down. If I've been operating at interstate speeds or load for a duration especially.
lastly. One of my trucks is geared low.. 4.88 rear in a 99 ford f450 I turn 2750 rpm to KINDA stay with traffic on the interstate.. yellow area on my tach starts at about 3300 or 3400.. so i'm real close to max rpm.. in this application.. I like a synthetic oil. IE.. I consider that 'extreme' or severe duty.
If those trucks were just yard tenders or sometng I'd be running dino in them. but the 250, 350 and 450 get the snot worked out of them. The 250 actually had been throwing turbo underpressure codes for a while.. i switched to syn and within 2 weeks the issue went away and has never returned. previous to that the 250 had been on motorcraft psd 15w40... not a cheap oil for a dino either... coincidence? possibly.. possibly not..
lastly. One of my trucks is geared low.. 4.88 rear in a 99 ford f450 I turn 2750 rpm to KINDA stay with traffic on the interstate.. yellow area on my tach starts at about 3300 or 3400.. so i'm real close to max rpm.. in this application.. I like a synthetic oil. IE.. I consider that 'extreme' or severe duty.
If those trucks were just yard tenders or sometng I'd be running dino in them. but the 250, 350 and 450 get the snot worked out of them. The 250 actually had been throwing turbo underpressure codes for a while.. i switched to syn and within 2 weeks the issue went away and has never returned. previous to that the 250 had been on motorcraft psd 15w40... not a cheap oil for a dino either... coincidence? possibly.. possibly not..
Fair enough... I agree regarding startup and cold flow properties of synthetic for folks that live in extremely cold regions. That would be a viable benefit in that case. While I agree the molecular alignment of synthetic makes it more predictable, the base stock and add pack quality of today's conventional oil provides a film strength capable of paralleling that of synthetic. Comparison UOA's in my industry confirms that over and over again. Just about 100% of film loss is related to shearing out of grade which would be more relative to oil grade (weight) and very little to do with base stock difference. In short lighter weight oils have less shear resistance under load and heat which makes it important to choose according to your mileage or protection preference. Personally I just stick with 15w40 for a general industry accepted balance.
Regarding coking of turbo bearings, today's oils are nearly absent of sludge and carbon forming paraffin. This isn't an issue as it was years ago when there was a need for post lube and cool down timers. But I agree a little cool down is good insurance when EGT's are above 500 degrees or so. I just don't see the need for post lube systems and timers with today's lubes. It's a shame that companies try to use old school concerns to sell old ideas in a modern environment.