Hello all:
The efforts of many to confront Gurkin in person on April 24 are commendable. Unlike roughly 180 Farmtrac workers who've rolled over and given up like silent lambs led to the slaughter, the dealers do not to intend to go down quietly!
I do not claim to be an attorney, but... the idea that the auctioneer and the person who is performing wall-to-wall inventory of Farmtrac property are the same person seems to be a *glaring* conflict of interest.
Add the abnormally hurried effort to complete the auction ... and it smells of something really really rotten.
Is Gurkins' plan to auction the stuff off dirt cheap (possibly to himself through a 'partner'?), resell it at a higher rate and scoop up the profits?
If Gurkins (or a 'partner' of his) doesn't end up buying the equipment, he takes the auction fees (plus payroll wages for his weeks on-duty) and goes home. And the funds from the auction... are applied by the receiver to the outstanding debt of the secured loan *first*... unsecured loan(s) second [if any], then those who finance persons deem as smaller on the food chain... like suppliers, dealers, etc...
After all that, I'm sensing the receiver is going to slam the door shut, declare Chapter Seven and leave us dealers twisting in the wind and the employees with no compensation of any kind (some of 'em have saved *eons* of vacation and sick time).
What am I missing? Or inaccurate about?
And what can be done to keep this from happening?
--blueliner