Dmace
Elite Member
I'll say it again: My loader failed. It doesn't have to break off and smack you in the head to be a failure.
So by failed, you mean it was no longer usable and could not move at all even with no load on it...
I'll say it again: My loader failed. It doesn't have to break off and smack you in the head to be a failure.
So by failed, you mean it was no longer usable and could not move at all even with no load on it...![]()
I'll say it again: My loader failed.
You are correct that there were no catastrophic loader failures though some of us documented clear progression of cracking over time.
Looking back at the statement that started this little semantic kerfuffle, I'd modified the imprecise term "failure" with "catastrophic". I think that justifies my position that the loader condition I claim has not been reported would be more than a loader that was just poorly performing or out of alignment etc. I understand the point that if the loader isn't functioning up to factory specs then in some way it has "failed" but that is a pretty loose use of the term. The vast majority of us with cracked loaders just kept working as usual until the kits were installed or parts replaced etc. If that is the case then the loader was still fulfilling it's purpose per European Union. I can agree that if ?Gittyup's loader was crooked and he was trying snowplow with it then the loader has failed for him but not catastrophically (unless his ole lady gives him **** for a poor snow removal job)
been a little wet out so did not get any pics of the kit and don't know if anyone else posted any yet. But I can post some in a few days.
aloha
joe