First minor issue with my new 3016

[Shift4200]

The engine developers the required horse power at a given rpm.
Each implement requires a certain rpm to operate properly.
Properly operating implements equal proper horse power.

So yes, use the rpm necessary to get the performance you need but using a FEL is not the same as the BH as far as oil pressure/rpms needed.

Please, let me state all of this is based on my opinions, operator with more experience than me know better than I but to a point higher rpm related to better performance.

Scrambler,

Yes, you are entitled to your opinion. And to a degree you are accurate in your statements. However my opinion is different in that I prefer to operate my machine at a lower RPM and still achieve as much power as I need, if not more. We've gone off topic here a bit, this all started with you asking why an operator would run their machine sub 2k rpm when using their BH. I cannot speak for everyone, but in my time here on TBN, it seems a good majority of the population also runs at a lower RPM if they feel their hydro's are too 'snappy'.

Another thing to keep in mind is we are using completely different machines, and the OP is on one that's even bigger than both of ours. A quick internet search shows that your Hydro pump operates at 3.5gpm, the Mahindra Max25 runs at 4.6gmp and the OP's 3016 at a whopping 7.8gpm. This factor alone will impact the functionality of all hydraulically controlled implements.

-J

 

[oldpilgrim]

I'm still trying to get used to my machine. I used my old Fergie with FEL, BH for 25 years and hardly ever ran it over 1200 RPMs. Had no need too. I'm guessing that the Continental Z129 engine might have had a bit more torque at lower rpms. Also the BH was a bit more substantial and I an now trying to undo 25 years of habits.

I'm getting there.

 

[David Devuono]

Remember that for the most part, engine speed does not equate to pressure, just flow.