Texasmark
Elite Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,703
- Location
- N. Texas
- Tractor
- Ford: '88 3910 Series II, '80 3600, '65 3000; '07 6530C Branson with FEL, 2020 LS MT225S. Case-IH 395 and 895 with cab. All Diesels
A possibility here may be "rolling circumference". In foam filling, since my interpretation of foam filling is an "expansion-solidification" product, like the foam you use to seal openings around the house, there may be a situation where it caused the bias tire to balloon, which increased the rolling circumference ratio with the rears.
With a longer circumference, for a given gear ratio, the ground covered by the front would be more than the rear in proportion to non-filled and that would put more stress on the front axle drive mechanism...it's not only moving the vehicle over the terrain, but it's dragging the rears in the process ...aka the coupling mentioned herein could suffer as a result.
With a longer circumference, for a given gear ratio, the ground covered by the front would be more than the rear in proportion to non-filled and that would put more stress on the front axle drive mechanism...it's not only moving the vehicle over the terrain, but it's dragging the rears in the process ...aka the coupling mentioned herein could suffer as a result.