Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned!

   / Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned! #11  
   / Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned! #12  
I'd hate to drive around in my timber with a backhoe for ballast. The smaller the better.
My backhoe has taken lots of timber hits when I back up blindly. No damage to anything other than the trees.
 
   / Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned! #13  
Very nice work Luke. I should have posted my Junkas* ballast weight rack pics here. :eek:
 
   / Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned! #14  
At which point I could unhook the backhoe and use a box blade.
Which is maybe 2-3 times longer than my ballast box and maybe half as heavy (if that). I bet your ballast box doesn't have a receiver hitch for pulling the firewood out when you are all done at the end of the day either.
 
   / Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned! #15  
My backhoe has taken lots of timber hits when I back up blindly. No damage to anything other than the trees.

I do not consider damaging trees acceptable. They are far too valuable to me.
 
   / Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned! #16  
I do not consider damaging trees acceptable. They are far too valuable to me.

Yeah I'm kinda picky about that too.

Everyone has different acceptability levels for ballast. If all I'm after is ballast I always use my ballast weight rack. It's QH compatible which makes it even more useable. I'll even set it down when working in the timber until I get to the part of the job that requires it. Shortens me up so I don't bang into stuff so bad. :)
 
   / Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned! #17  
My backhoe has taken lots of timber hits when I back up blindly. No damage to anything other than the trees.

Me too... BH great ballast and helps get me unstuck too! Dead weight doesn't do that.
 
   / Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned! #18  
I think it's....to Each their own.....Ya Know...
 
   / Franken-ballast: expensive and poorly planned! #19  
This really is a great job and useful. More guys should do this rather than load their tires.

Weight on; weight off. Weight on: weight off. It's that easy and makes the tractor so much more versatile.
So when i use my box scrapper or any ground engaging equipment thats on the ground an providing zero normal force on the rear tires. The 2000lbs of juice added to the tires adds a fair amount of tractive effort allowing me to pull tje 1400lb box scrapper with the shanks down through clay without spinning out constantly. My tractor is a tractor ive never thought about taking the weight out of the tires.

Tire ballast has its purpose its not the optimal ballast loader work though
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

John Deere HPX 4x4 Gator (A44502)
John Deere HPX 4x4...
2011 BEALL TRAILER PNEUMATIC TRAILER (A45333)
2011 BEALL TRAILER...
2019 HINO 268 26FT NON CDL BOX TRUCK (A43004)
2019 HINO 268 26FT...
2015 FREIGHTLINER CORONADO 122 SD (A45333)
2015 FREIGHTLINER...
PALLET OF SAFETY FENCE (A45333)
PALLET OF SAFETY...
DEWALT ROTARY HAMMER (A45333)
DEWALT ROTARY...
 
Top