One other issue related to fel quick attaching on the Massey SCUT is the differences between the dl100 fell used between 006 and 2014 ND the dl95 that came out in 2015 and ongoing. You'll read on many threads that the dl95 has improved numbers and capacity than the dl100 . . . but what you won't read about is why.
Sure it's a different vendor . . but again. . . why different numbers? No, it's not magic, the dl95 loader is actually different . Let's take a specific difference. . . . the pins. The dl100 used a very standard sized pin. . . While the dl95 uses heavier, thicker pin. . Heavier than a dl100 pin and heavier than a BX pin. And if you see schematics on the dl95 engineering. . You'd see similar yes of differences in other areas of the fel.
That's all good except for one thing. . A dl100 fel connection to implements and a dl95 connection are not the same. So if you are building a quick attach for the dl100 and then converting it for the dl95 . . You find that it is a complete new engineering effort for the quick attach. That's one of the reasons why mytractortools.com was the 1st to come out with a quick attach for the dl95. And now I understand they have a saw quick attach option also.
But mytractortools.com specializes in SCUT implements and accessories so they have the bucket's and forks and grapples designed for Massey SCUT weight capacities and payload issues. Meanwhile other suppliers are selling heavier implements that are less efficient when it comes to payload.
I'm assume Massey wants to generate greater SCUT equipment sales before it gets into implement activity. Instead, Massey has focused on innovation in other areas. Here are a couple:
A backhoe for the gc1710 and gc1720 that allows them to also have a 3ph attached (kubota doesn't have it)
A dedicated mulching mmm deck using 6 blades and improved mulching capability (kubota doesn't have it)
And of course the dl95 fel and it's superior weight handling capabilities.
