<font color=blue>I guess that's really my question. Is .bmp the best?</font color=blue>
I don't think so, but it's what your program gives you.. and from what you say it's more than acceptable for your application.
<font color=blue>I also do need to do resizing and enlarging. The map does not seem to print as clearly between the original mapping software print out (on paper) and the "photo editor" program print out on paper. Is this just the nature of the beast?</font color=blue>
I believe that, in general, if you enlarge the size of any picture, you will get more pixelation and it will generally appear less clear.
<font color=blue>Also when working with graphics when do you need to use .bmp, .jpg, .gif, .tif, .emf, .xpm ETC.</font color=blue>
Well, I'm not much of an expert about this stuff. My understanding is that .bmp is generally used by Windows, for things like icons and wallpaper, .jpg is kind of the current standard, .gif is the old CompuServe format and has the advantages of being small and allowing animation, .tif is a lossless format which is generally considered the "best" in terms of pure quality, but results in very large file sizes, and the others ones you mention I've never even heard of. /w3tcompact/icons/smile.gif
Since we are starting with a .bmp file of a given resolution, I would think that you would not be able to improve on that resolution.. you can sharpen pictures with various techniques, but you can't really add resolution that isn't there in the first place.
I'm probably wrong about much of the above, and hopefully someone who knows whereof he/she speaks will show up and give you a better answer! (Harv? John? You around?)
I doubt this helps much, but it's the best I can do. Sorry. /w3tcompact/icons/blush.gif