Grapple Grapple needs flow restrictor?!

   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #1  

sixwarden9

New member
Joined
Aug 21, 2005
Messages
17
Location
East Texas
Tractor
NH TC-40A
I just built a grapple for my TC 40A with a 16LA loader. I am using one of my rear remotes to control the grapple. The cylinder is a 2"x6". I need to slow the grapple down to keep it from slamming open or closed.

I did a search for "flow restrictors" and came up with the following post: flow restrictor thread

This post left me quite confused. I would not like to spend an additional $50 dollars on adjustable valves as I am already past my budget. I was hoping to use the pinhole or restricted in one direction valves available at TSC or Northern Tool.

So the question is the same as in the post:

One or two flow restrictors and where do I put them?
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #2  
It would be great to hear how 'adlertom' came out using the flow restrictor 'washers' with the tiny hole.

I've seen that done, and it works. Just not what I have used because as oil temp changes, so does the speed. Although I will admit that I don't change the setting very often.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?!
  • Thread Starter
#3  
"It would be great to hear how 'adlertom' came out using the flow restrictor 'washers' with the tiny hole."

My thoughts exactly, I was unsure about creating a new post, but decided to do so because the other post is nearly a year old.

A far as fluid speed and temperature, am I correct in thinking it flows faster as it gets warmer?
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #4  
Try reducing the size of the hoses from whatever you have now (3/8" or 1/2") to 1/4". I did this for my TNT and it greatly reduced the speed of operation. The smaller diameter hoses act just like a restrictor and depending on your circumstances, may be cheaper than adding a flow restrictor.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #5  
Hoses reduced in size seems like a good try.
Would a reducer fitting to ¼" size and back to the hose size on now, also work? Save some $$ if it would.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #6  
You can buy flow restricters at TSC,They cost around $7.00 each . You will need to buy 2,one for each side. Get the restricters with the smallest hole . Try it out and if you need more flow just drill out the restricter hole to the next size larger until you get the speed you want. I have done this to my snowblower chute motor and my FEL snow blade turning cylinders and it works fine. This will save the cost of going to smaller hose and you still may end up putting on flow restricters. Be sure to clean the restricters out good if you drill them.

Bernie
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?!
  • Thread Starter
#7  
Thanks for the input so for.

Question:

Should I put the flow restrictors at the cylinder, or at the remote end. Does it really matter?

A little more about my setup:

I am running 1/2" hose from the remote to the a set of quick connects. At the connection I switch to 3/8" hose to the cylinder. I do not know if this helps or hinders. I went with this because the longest 3/8" hose I could get was 8 feet and I needed 16.

Also, I noticed when the grapple is raised all the way it settles a little. Another post had mentioned using a check valve. Could this work with flow restrictors? How do they work? I should probably get my flow right before I worry about a check valve.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?!
  • Thread Starter
#8  
One more note and question:

The hydraulic flow on my tractor is 9.8 gpm. Do they sell restictors by flow rate or just hole diameter.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #9  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Should I put the flow restrictors at the cylinder, or at the remote end. Does it really matter? )</font>

I personally would put them at the cylinder.

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( I am running 1/2" hose from the remote to the a set of quick connects. At the connection I switch to 3/8" hose to the cylinder. I do not know if this helps or hinders. I went with this because the longest 3/8" hose I could get was 8 feet and I needed 16. )</font>

If anything it would help. You would be surprised how much a difference 1/4" hoses make. 3/8" to 1/4" makes my snowblower chute and deflection cylinders very easy to control.

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Also, I noticed when the grapple is raised all the way it settles a little. Another post had mentioned using a check valve. Could this work with flow restrictors? How do they work? I should probably get my flow right before I worry about a check valve. )</font>

The leak down is from the cylinder. Double pilot operated check valves on the cylinder will fix this problem. Flow restrictors with piloted check valve cylinders are ok.

I agree that you should get your flow correct then worry about leak down as they are two different problems with two different solutions.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #10  
I keep my restricters at the cylinders. I don't know that it matters . As for check valves I did not use them on any of my applicatios and have had no problems yet. I keep all my hoses 1/2 just to keep away from all the adapters.So far I have a sickle bar mower cylinder a snow plow cylinder and a snowblowerchute motor with restricters on them. Thats all I can tell you, I just experiment and see what works best.

Bernie
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #11  
I used 1/4" hoses and a single 0.030 orifice I got from my New Holland dealer for $4.95. All the oil has to go thru the single orifice. It just changes direction, so all you need is one orifice. I put it between one quick-connect fitting and the hose fitting. I have absolutely terrific feather control of my single cylinder grapple. If it were two cylinders, I'm sure I'd have even better control. I bet I could pick up a sheet of paper without even poking a hole in it. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

One caution I got from Mark at Carter & Carter was that on systems where there is a lot of flow, over time the orifice will cause a jet of fluid that can penetrate the hose. He suggested using a 90° fitting between the orifice and the flexible rubber hose. I think that's good advice. There's no need to tempt fate with a possible hose failure if a simple fitting can protect the hose. /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?!
  • Thread Starter
#12  
Well gentleman, I will take all of your advice under consideration. Its been a slow morining at the office, but I'm about to hits the streets so I will be out of computer touch for a while. I am going to try and track some restrictors down this evening and might get them on tonight. I will keep you posted.

A side note: I have been working on this grapple as time permitted for a couple of months. After RITA we went without power for 10 days and lost numerous trees, most of which were on my power lines. So the need to pick up trees is now more of a necessity than a luxury. Once again, thanks for the input.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #13  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Do they sell restictors by flow rate or just hole diameter. )</font>
Yes they do. Here is one example at Surplus Center I have no idea if the restriction would be enough for you needs. But for under 10 bucks it might be worth a try. I'm sure some futher looking around might turn up something similar with an even lower flow rate.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?!
  • Thread Starter
#14  
BigDogues,

Your post brought up one more question (I ask alot of questions).

Port size when talking about hydraulics, i.e., SAE 8. I have searched the web for something that will translate this for me. I am pretty sure SAE stands for Society of Automotive Engineers and in this context is used to desribe an industry standard size for the holes. How does this translate to inches, or am I way off base.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #15  
Here you go. Conversions for SAE to thread size.

SAE 4 = 7/16 - 20
SAE 5 = 1/2 - 20
SAE 6 = 9/16 - 18
SAE 8 = 3/4 - 16
SAE 10 = 7/8 - 14
SAE 12 = 1 1/16 - 12
SAE 14 = 1 3/16 - 12
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?!
  • Thread Starter
#16  
I went by TSC and bought two 1/32" (.031) restrictors for my 3/8" line. I put one on at the piston end of the cylinder (where the piston comes out of the cylinder) and tried it out. I worked great. I only paid $4.00 each for them so I will keep one in reserve, unless there is good arguement for using both. If I continue to use only one, does it matter in terms of grip strength whether the restrictor is on the piston side or the (for lack of a better term) butt end.

<font color="blue">He suggested using a 90° fitting between the orifice and the flexible rubber hose. </font>

I took your advice Jim and placed before a 90 degree fitting. I would like to use 1/4" hose, but can't find any long enough.

The one thing I did notice between last night and today was how much harder the pump is working to push the fluid through the pin hole. The engine lugs down a little when I activate the cylinder (about 200 rpms). It was not doing this before the restrictor. Short term I do not see this as a problem, but long term I see extra wear on my hydraulic pump.
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #17  
Here is a handy chart to add to, ummm, I mean lessen the confusion. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?! #18  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( The one thing I did notice between last night and today was how much harder the pump is working to push the fluid through the pin hole. The engine lugs down a little when I activate the cylinder (about 200 rpms). It was not doing this before the restrictor. Short term I do not see this as a problem, but long term I see extra wear on my hydraulic pump.
)</font>

In an open-center system, as soon as you start to move the control valve, the open-center closes off as the working port opens. This always causes loading of the hydraulic pump and shows up as lowered engine rpm. I don't think you have anything to worry about in regards to pump damage. The control valves are designed so you never get a complete hydraulic lock. There is always some flow as the valve goes from open-center to working port flow. The fluid surely gets warm, but you won't stay in that situation long enough to cause the fluid to overheat. I would just consider what you described as proof that the orifice is doing its job. The grapple will move to the desired location in a short time and then when you center the control valve, the pump will go back to its free flow condition. In my opinion, the pump will not be in any danger of damage whatsoever. /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif
 
   / Grapple needs flow restrictor?!
  • Thread Starter
#19  
Thanks for all the help gentleman. I removed a tree off of a shed and a fence last night. What a time saver. I decided to start saving my pennies for a valve kit, probably from W.R. Long. When I get my grapple painted and the valve kit I will post a couple of pics of me cutting trees down with my tree cutter and moving them to the burn pile with the grapple.

Matthew
 
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

Adams Tilt Trailer (A56438)
Adams Tilt Trailer...
2005 MACK TRI AXLE DUMP TRUCK (A52707)
2005 MACK TRI AXLE...
2020 PETERBILT 567 (A58214)
2020 PETERBILT 567...
2022 BROCE BW260 SWEEPER (A60429)
2022 BROCE BW260...
2023 FORD F750 CAB & CHASSIS (A57880)
2023 FORD F750 CAB...
2012 John Deere 6170R (A57148)
2012 John Deere...
 
Top