Harbor Freight tools that DO suck

[Oaktree]

I tried them once in a camera, even new they wouldn't power the camera. As said, they may work for a few minutes in a flashlight if they dont leak corrosive chemicals inside your light. I sure wouldn't put them in anything of value.

To be fair, cameras can be fussy about batteries. I can't even get name brand alkalines to work dependably in mine. It's either good (no Rayovacs) rechargeables or lithiums.
Or for whatever reason, the Chinese brand I'd never heard of AAs that came with it. :confused3:

I've had good luck with HF's alkalines in flashlights, remotes, etc., never bothered with the so-called heavy duty ones.

 

[Threepoint]

I tried them once in a camera, even new they wouldn't power the camera. As said, they may work for a few minutes in a flashlight if they dont leak corrosive chemicals inside your light. I sure wouldn't put them in anything of value.

Gary, cameras are tough on batteries. And expensive.

Don't give up on the HFs! I've used the AAs and AAAs for years as replacements in flashlights and other inexpensive devices and never had a problem. Well maybe one leak I can recall, after a year or so. And that did no damage. I just wiped off the terminal.

The original batteries that come with the free flashlights don't seem to be as good as the yellow and black free batteries. Just my experience.

 

[Gary Fowler]

I have had just about all brand of batteries leak including Duracell and Rayovac. They leak as often as cheaper ones. I recently replaced some Duracell batteries in a flashlight that were still working but a bit dim. One of the batteries had began leaking. If I had left it much longer, it would likely have ruined my expensive LED flashlight.

 

[Handloader109]

Heck, duracrap batteries leak very often. I dont buy them for that reason. The HF batteries that you get free are not bad. Dont last a long time, but free is free. I'd not pay $ for them ....

 

[Professor Marvel]

The HF quick hitch was fully capable of showing me that I have no use for such a contraption,,,

I am glad I only spent $70 to learn, rather than the $300 or $400 that JD charges for the I-Match hitch,, that would be equally useless.

I am enjoying the Pat's Hitch System,,

I found the same thing. My NH tractor has telescoping lower links and the turnbuckle system was replaced by a telescoping system with pins that slides. This quick hitch made it impossible to take advantage of both these features and was extremely frustrating. If I decide to go with another quick hitch it will be a Pats

 

[CADplans]

I found the same thing. My NH tractor has telescoping lower links and the turnbuckle system was replaced by a telescoping system with pins that slides.

The lower links on my 584 IH are extendable,, they are easier to use than a QH or Pats,,

I can hook up this 1200 pound land plane in under 5 minutes with zero struggle,,,

If I had a QH or Pats,, hookup would, as a minimum, require a crow bar and two people,,,

 

[California]

I can hook up this 1200 pound land plane in under 5 minutes with zero struggle ...

If I had a QH or Pats, hookup would ... require a crow bar and two people

Why waste 5 minutes every time? For something like that with no PTO hookup I just back up to it and raise the QH. Then reach back and flip the levers over to lock it in place. 30 seconds max.

No crowbar, unless it's an implement that doesn't match (and that I rarely use) that requires taking the QH off, and then precision alignment with a 6 ft bar. It's easier to modify the implements than it is to rassle them around every time.

One new thing you can do with a QH is shove or tug an implement to align it - without getting off the tractor - if it has sunk into the earth crooked since it was last used.

QH isn't a perfect solution for everything but overall it's a great time (and back) saver, in my opinion. The one thing on a HF QH that needs upgrade if you have an implement that hits the the hook's bolts is buy the Speeco rear hook that has the hook offset farther back. $25~$30. And mount it with slide-in pins that can be changed more easily than the bolts.

 

[CADplans]

Why waste 5 minutes every time? For something like that with no PTO hookup I just back up to it and raise the QH. .

Show us a pic of the 1200 pound, seven foot wide attachment that you have connected to your QH,,, please,,,

 

[California]

Show us a pic of the 1200 pound, seven foot wide attachment that you have connected to your QH,,, please,,,

My tractors are half the size of yours (18 and 24 hp). Like you, I have implements that are proportional in size to my tractors.

Both tractors are capable of backing up to an implement and shoving it around if it can't be hooked where it sits.

Here's a small implement modified to 'standard' QH conformance by adding a couple of washers so I can pick it up in a moment. Before, it tended to sink into the ground when not used so it had to be aligned with a crowbar every time. Now, just lift and go.

QH and a loop of chain at the top to make a top link that accommodates an extreme angle without binding. (Or lifting the tractor's rear tires off the ground,in this situation).

QH as the basis for back-up-and-lift rear forks I made. Pic 1 Pic2

The mower, forks, and trailers are the implements I swap among most frequently. It takes a just moment to drop in the towbar with trailer ball. Watering on uneven ground, it's handy to lift or lower the ball to level the waterline in the watering trailer as it nears empty.

And the QH is a good platform for mounting stuff. Temporary ballast for using the loader in a tight space behind the barn. A 3-point lifter I built for a drag harrow - Version 1. Version 2 with a pulley for compound lift.

For me swapping quickly among these applications without any back strain makes the QH worthwhile. When I occasionally need the box blade that isn't compatible, and is always sunk into the earth when I go to align it, I cuss and wish I had adapted it.



The only photo I have of a non compatible implement. This came with this tractor when I bought it. I've never used it, should get rid of it.

In summary - some people have applications where the QH is very useful.

 

[CADplans]

My tractors are half the size of yours (18 and 24 hp). Like you, I have implements that are proportional in size to my tractors.

As I showed, in my pic,, that 1200 pound attachment is BIG,, but, I will never convince you so, ,,,,:confused2: