jeff9366
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2011
- Messages
- 12,777
- Tractor
- Kubota Tractor Loader L3560 HST+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3,700 pounds bare tractor, 5,400 pounds operating weight, 37 horsepower
Howlin
Would it be wishful thinking to believe that I could run a 72" tiller with 28.9 PTO HP?
No. The rotating tiller tines push the tractor forward using a normal, forward rotation roto-tiller. I suggest shopping 72" and 84" forward rotation roto-tillers. ((For mainly food plots some choose an roto-tiller no wider than tractor, so they can pass between trees without raised implement hanging up.))
Reverse rotation rototillers require a lot more PTO power, as rotating tines resist forward tractor/tiller progress. Reverse rotation rototillers are built heavier to withstand greater stress in operation.
What would be considered a heavy tiller? It looks like most tillers available near me in the 5-6ft range weigh between 550-720 lbs.
The key metric is weight per unit of operating width. Heavy per unit of width is better than light per unit of width. Budget will help you decide.
Is tiller weight more important than # of tines per flange, or C vs. L-shaped tines?
This question is really asking me to slice a whole loaf of warm bread into very thin slices. Your specified variables interact, so difficult to answer.
Fewer tines, less resistance to rotation, less masticated output. Weight per unit of width is always the implement metric I consider first for ground engagement work. If you will also use roto-tiller as max FEL lift counterbalance, which is very common, calculate how much TPH weight you need for max lifts. This calculation is affected moderately by air or liquid filled rear tires.
C-tines work best in clay soil. C-tines work better on ground in grass as C-tines seldom wrap crop residue.
L-tines work best in sandy soils and when you are mixing organic material into soil.
T-B-N ARCHIVE: C vs L tines site:tractorbynet.com - Google Search
Would it be wishful thinking to believe that I could run a 72" tiller with 28.9 PTO HP?
No. The rotating tiller tines push the tractor forward using a normal, forward rotation roto-tiller. I suggest shopping 72" and 84" forward rotation roto-tillers. ((For mainly food plots some choose an roto-tiller no wider than tractor, so they can pass between trees without raised implement hanging up.))
Reverse rotation rototillers require a lot more PTO power, as rotating tines resist forward tractor/tiller progress. Reverse rotation rototillers are built heavier to withstand greater stress in operation.
What would be considered a heavy tiller? It looks like most tillers available near me in the 5-6ft range weigh between 550-720 lbs.
The key metric is weight per unit of operating width. Heavy per unit of width is better than light per unit of width. Budget will help you decide.
Is tiller weight more important than # of tines per flange, or C vs. L-shaped tines?
This question is really asking me to slice a whole loaf of warm bread into very thin slices. Your specified variables interact, so difficult to answer.
Fewer tines, less resistance to rotation, less masticated output. Weight per unit of width is always the implement metric I consider first for ground engagement work. If you will also use roto-tiller as max FEL lift counterbalance, which is very common, calculate how much TPH weight you need for max lifts. This calculation is affected moderately by air or liquid filled rear tires.
C-tines work best in clay soil. C-tines work better on ground in grass as C-tines seldom wrap crop residue.
L-tines work best in sandy soils and when you are mixing organic material into soil.
T-B-N ARCHIVE: C vs L tines site:tractorbynet.com - Google Search
Last edited: