Hi Buckeye,
I believe every home buyer or seller should have an accurate evaluation of a house they intend to buy or sell.
At the same, I feel many of these "inspection" services have taken on a quasi-dictatorial manner which screws up a great many real estate deals. Just ask your broker. In most states, the "inspectors" are not licensed, certified, educated or even tested in any way. There is one national "organization" for home inspectors which costs around $350 to join. That is the extent of their "qualifications."
Interestingly, the code of ethics and even the application form for that organization stresses that the inspectors must avoid engaging in conflict of interest, and specifically warns against creating false reports to generate cash for themselves or friends. The idea that home inspectors are a "professional" is incorrect in most states, since they are not one of the regulated "professions." People need to understand just what their status is.
We had a very troubling incident last year in trying to sell our own home. We had had our own inspection done, and everything was okay. Our home, while around 20 years old, is exceptionally well cared for, and we have always fixed every item, however minor, and always used the finest materials. Still, if there was anything wrong that we were unaware of, we wanted to fix it prior to sale. The inspection report was fine.
However, the seller had their own home inspector who "failed" our septic system. He claimed, he could "smell" sewage. The system had passed two separate dye tests in a three month period, and had never caused one problem for us. Still, this inspector caused the collapse of our house sale. We lost out on a $175,000 deal.
We had no recourse at all, and now all of the real estate agents consider our property has a "septic problem." It does not have any problem at all, but short of installing a whole new system, we can't "prove" that it is in good order.
We even hired two different septic engineers (paid $200) and had two experienced septic installers out to examine our system. Result was four completely different answers (opinions)! BTW, all of these examiners said there was nothing wrong with the functionality of our system, but each failed to correctly identify the soil type, field type, etc. Not one got it right. We had the original plans and code report done at the time of construction of the house.
Fine, do an inspection. But IMO too many "inspections" are simply bogus make-work for "friends" of the inspectors. If these services are going to exist, they need to be much more qualified, also regulated by the State, and subject to penalties. When they "find" problems with a house a couple of weeks before closing, it practically forces the seller to put in a new component. In our case, the buyers inspector "found" more than $15,000 of "problems" that needed fixing. AND, OF COURSE, HE WAS ONLY TOO GLAD TO "RECOMMEND" COMPANIES TO DO THE WORK. Talk about unethical...
Obviously, I think home inspectors are of limited value. I would instead hire a good housing contractor or engineer. I put more weight on their opinions, because they are educated and licensed. Enough of these glorified ditch diggers hauling their little plastic bucket of tools around and calling themselves "home inspectors.” I am sure there are some qualified home inspectors out there. But in too many areas, they have assumed far too great a role in the "approval" process of buying or selling a home.
Just my experience & opinions...
I believe every home buyer or seller should have an accurate evaluation of a house they intend to buy or sell.
At the same, I feel many of these "inspection" services have taken on a quasi-dictatorial manner which screws up a great many real estate deals. Just ask your broker. In most states, the "inspectors" are not licensed, certified, educated or even tested in any way. There is one national "organization" for home inspectors which costs around $350 to join. That is the extent of their "qualifications."
Interestingly, the code of ethics and even the application form for that organization stresses that the inspectors must avoid engaging in conflict of interest, and specifically warns against creating false reports to generate cash for themselves or friends. The idea that home inspectors are a "professional" is incorrect in most states, since they are not one of the regulated "professions." People need to understand just what their status is.
We had a very troubling incident last year in trying to sell our own home. We had had our own inspection done, and everything was okay. Our home, while around 20 years old, is exceptionally well cared for, and we have always fixed every item, however minor, and always used the finest materials. Still, if there was anything wrong that we were unaware of, we wanted to fix it prior to sale. The inspection report was fine.
However, the seller had their own home inspector who "failed" our septic system. He claimed, he could "smell" sewage. The system had passed two separate dye tests in a three month period, and had never caused one problem for us. Still, this inspector caused the collapse of our house sale. We lost out on a $175,000 deal.
We had no recourse at all, and now all of the real estate agents consider our property has a "septic problem." It does not have any problem at all, but short of installing a whole new system, we can't "prove" that it is in good order.
We even hired two different septic engineers (paid $200) and had two experienced septic installers out to examine our system. Result was four completely different answers (opinions)! BTW, all of these examiners said there was nothing wrong with the functionality of our system, but each failed to correctly identify the soil type, field type, etc. Not one got it right. We had the original plans and code report done at the time of construction of the house.
Fine, do an inspection. But IMO too many "inspections" are simply bogus make-work for "friends" of the inspectors. If these services are going to exist, they need to be much more qualified, also regulated by the State, and subject to penalties. When they "find" problems with a house a couple of weeks before closing, it practically forces the seller to put in a new component. In our case, the buyers inspector "found" more than $15,000 of "problems" that needed fixing. AND, OF COURSE, HE WAS ONLY TOO GLAD TO "RECOMMEND" COMPANIES TO DO THE WORK. Talk about unethical...
Obviously, I think home inspectors are of limited value. I would instead hire a good housing contractor or engineer. I put more weight on their opinions, because they are educated and licensed. Enough of these glorified ditch diggers hauling their little plastic bucket of tools around and calling themselves "home inspectors.” I am sure there are some qualified home inspectors out there. But in too many areas, they have assumed far too great a role in the "approval" process of buying or selling a home.
Just my experience & opinions...