ddivinia
Elite Member
Good point - resale difference.
Realistically, as you have stated before, the increased horsepower isn't that much of an advantage - if at all.
'Spose it could translate into using a bigger mower or running a round baler (4720...?).
A local farmer that put up some of the bales (small squares and rounds) that I bought for my horses has a new JD465 (I think) silage baler. It has an acid spray attachment that preserves high-moisture hay and makes it possible to get a hay crop during year's when many grower's are experiencing significant losses (like this season).
He was running the baler with a new, JD5525 (2WD). It looked like the baler was smaller and kicked the tractor around alot less than an older, plastic wrapper JD baler that was hooked up to a JD3010. I wanna think that the older baler was a JD535 or 545.
Both balers were just sprinting down the rows, but that old baler would really shake that 3010 (with FEL, too) around whenever he'd stop to kick a bale out! I couldn't imagine hooking a 4720 up to the older baler but it might power that newer model.
AKfish
Old round baler, new round baler - unless it is a really small one I would not put it behind a 4x20. I run my 467 round baler on my 5525 4WD and I would not want any less tractor. In many cases I think the baler or cutter would be running the tractor, not the other way around.
D.