HOW BIGA ?

   / HOW BIGA ?
  • Thread Starter
#21  
CharlieTR said:
A little confused here.

But here is my novice experience anyway.
When I built my place I went to the county's TxDOT for a permit.
(No charge for residential).
They gave me stakes and flags to mark the location of culvert.
Engineer came, mailed design plans with detail reqs.
Things like width limit, radius of driveway turn-in, etc.
The engineer was cool and advised he only cared about two things.
1. proper size of culvert
2. saftey ends and installed properly.

He advised that the ditch was 2 ft deep, and I must have 18" culvert, with 6" of cover on top. Design spec stated that water must not drain onto road surface.

No problems at all since. Have had 6 concrete mixers over it and 2 were loaded with 10 yards each. Not sure but I was told that is 78,000 pounds total. Never had a problem.

PS. The semi drivers usually tell me they are glad I have 30 foot long culvert.
Some even ask how long it is before they come out.
Where?
Perhaps I can help.
 
   / HOW BIGA ?
  • Thread Starter
#22  
CharlieTR said:
A little confused here.


The engineer was cool and advised he only cared about two things.
1. proper size of culvert
2. saftey ends and installed properly.

He advised that the ditch was 2 ft deep, and I must have 18" culvert, with 6" of cover on top. Design spec stated that water must not drain onto road surface.


.
I still say basing the diameter of the culvert on the size of the ditch ain't the correct way of doing it.
How do we know the ditch is not to big or to small?
If the ditch is the wrong size and the culvert size is determined from ditch size then the culvert will be the wrong size also.
 
   / HOW BIGA ? #23  
Just a little confused on the terms or can't seem to picture the Schmism's solution in my head. But that's OK, confusion come natural to me. (a lot).

The little I know about the road ditches around here is that they are sized by DOT for drainage needs and built when road is built. I would ask that exact question to your county DOT engineer.
 
   / HOW BIGA ?
  • Thread Starter
#24  
CharlieTR said:
Just a little confused on the terms or can't seem to picture the Schmism's solution in my head. But that's OK, confusion come natural to me. (a lot).

The little I know about the road ditches around here is that they are sized by DOT for drainage needs and built when road is built. I would ask that exact question to your county DOT engineer.[/quote]

The problem with that is ditches don't stay the way were built. In 40 50 75 years they chang size and shape due to erosion cave ins and cleaning out.
I was showing the guy ftom the state the ditch last summer and the first thing out of his mouth was my god that's way to deep - wonder why it's so darn deep?

Another thing> .They don't change a lot of their drainage ditches and culverts to match changes in topography.
 
   / HOW BIGA ? #25  
LBrown59 said:
I still say basing the diameter of the culvert on the size of the ditch ain't the correct way of doing it.
How do we know the ditch is not to big or to small?
If the ditch is the wrong size and the culvert size is determined from ditch size then the culvert will be the wrong size also.

Hold on now Mr Brown, no one said that because it was a 24" ditch, that was the only reason to use an 18" culvert. The engineer wanted the largest culvert he could get into that ditch because of his statement that he didn't want water draining out onto the county roadbed from overflow. In this case the engineer was not going to allow ditch modification. Rightfully so because he is protecting his public roadbed, which is what the taxpayers pay him to do.

In every instance where I install a culvert for a private drive, the first concern is the public roadbed, without exception. I've redesigned private drives because they endangered the public roadbed. Again, that's what the taxpayers are paying for.

First issue, the culvert size is determined by drainage demands.

Second issue, the ditch is modified to fit the culvert size.

Third issue, the driveway is modified to fit the determined culvert and ditch size.
 
   / HOW BIGA ?
  • Thread Starter
#26  
1*First issue, the culvert size is determined by drainage demands.
2*Second issue, the ditch is modified to fit the culvert size.
3*Third issue, the driveway is modified to fit the determined culvert and ditch size.

***************
1*When my 12'' culvert rusted out the state required an 18'' replacement culvert.
2*No consideration was given to drainage demands.
The ditch was never repaired/corrected to match either volume of water flow/drainage demand or culvert size.
I don't call a 3 to 5 foot deep and wide ditch for an 18'' culvert much of a match.
3* The culvert is already in and is just fine it's the ditch that needs repaired and corrected not the culvert.



ovrszd said:
First issue, the culvert size is determined by drainage demands.

Second issue, the ditch is modified to fit the culvert size.

Third issue, the driveway is modified to fit the determined culvert and ditch size.
 
   / HOW BIGA ?
  • Thread Starter
#27  
I Had a 12'' corrugated steel driveway culvert that lasted 30 years before rusting out.
When I replaced it the state specked 15'' corrugated Double wall smooth bore plastic culvert. Don't ask me why.
In 30 years the 12 incher handled the water flow just fine.
Never once did it ever over flow onto the road drive way or yard; not even during the longest hardest down pours.
After 30 years the road ditch had eroded to where it was much much deeper and wider than it was when the steel culvert was installed.
Seems to me requiring a bigger culvert because the ditch had become larger was the wrong approach.
Logic would dictate the proper way of going about things was to repair the ditch first then determine the culvert size based on the size of the repaired ditch.
Upping the size of the culvert as the size of the ditch increase solves nothing but it does compound the problem.
 
   / HOW BIGA ? #28  
LBrown59 said:
I Had a 12'' corrugated steel driveway culvert that lasted 30 years before rusting out.
When I replaced it the state specked 15'' corrugated Double wall smooth bore plastic culvert. Don't ask me why.
In 30 years the 12 incher handled the water flow just fine.
Never once did it ever over flow onto the road drive way or yard; not even during the longest hardest down pours.
After 30 years the road ditch had eroded to where it was much much deeper and wider than it was when the steel culvert was installed.
Seems to me requiring a bigger culvert because the ditch had become larger was the wrong approach.
Logic would dictate the proper way of going about things was to repair the ditch first then determine the culvert size based on the size of the repaired ditch.
Upping the size of the culvert as the size of the ditch increase solves nothing but it does compound the problem.


Every governmental organization has different rules concerning culverts. Size, amount of overfill, angle cut of ends, type of culvert, culvert material, etc. In my case we don't allow 12" culverts. They used to. But don't now because there is too much risk of plugging a 12". That rule was changed about ten years ago. So if the life expectancy of a galvanized culvert in your area is 30 years, and your rules changed ten years ago, for the next twenty years your government is going to face discussions with customers as to why they now have to install a bigger culvert???

As I stated above, the first thing to determine is drainage. That is the primary consideration in determining culvert size. In your case it simply sounds like they have changed the minimum culvert size.

Also most organizations want you to use double wall, smooth bore plastic because of the life expectancy. I've been installing culverts since 1989. I don't expect to replace any plastic culvert because of material failure in my lifetime. In my country a galvanized culvert life expectancy is about 15 years if conditions are favorable. I have already replaced several galvanized culverts that I installed since 1989.

One last thing I would add about galvanized culverts. When I started almost twenty years ago I could throw a chain around the middle of an 18", 30 foot long culvert and pick it up with a backhoe without damage. About ten years ago I noticed that I could no longer do that without the culvert buckling and folding in the middle. So I started picking them up with a chain hook at each end. A few years later I had to quit doing that because the metal was so thin the hook would tear thru it. So you can't compare the life span of a 30 year old galvanized culvert to one bought today. They are tremendously different in quality and gauge of metal. That is another reason I use plastic unless it's a big culvert.
 
   / HOW BIGA ?
  • Thread Starter
#29  
1*there is too much risk of plugging a 12."
2*As I stated above, the first thing to determine is drainage.
3* In your case it simply sounds like they have changed the minimum culvert size.
4*the first thing to determine is drainage.
---->>......>>>
1*When A 12'' corrugated steel culvert never plugged up in 30 years surly a 12'' double wall smooth bore plastic culvert would have been more than enough extra assurance against clogging up.
2*This was determined when the road was built and the ditches installed, however things change a lot in 100 years. In some cases the changes are drastic.
One example is a 24 "culvert buried 15 feet or more under the road bed to handle a small creek only problem is there is no creek there now so no need for a culvert that deep anymore. It don't need to be that big either. Do you need the same size culvert for a small to medium ditch as you do for creeks and runs?
Several years ago the state replaced the old rusted out culvert with a new one.
Instead of installing the replacement to fit / blend in with the present terrain they put the new one right where the old one was.
As a result we now have a huge hole within 3 feet of the edge of the pavement big enough to swallow up a large van or even small trucks that are bigger than pick ups.
To make matters worse the road ditch was filled in leaving a perfect runway dead ending with a drop off right into that hole.
3*With or without considering the culvert nothing has been done about the screwed up ditch.
4*I don't think a ditch that varies back and forth between 3 to 5 foot wide and deep was determined by drainage need or anything else.
The one size fits all mentality is the big problem with government regulation.
 
   / HOW BIGA ? #30  
LBrown59 said:
1*there is too much risk of plugging a 12."
2*As I stated above, the first thing to determine is drainage.
3* In your case it simply sounds like they have changed the minimum culvert size.
4*the first thing to determine is drainage.
---->>......>>>
1*When A 12'' corrugated steel culvert never plugged up in 30 years surly a 12'' double wall smooth bore plastic culvert would have been more than enough extra assurance against clogging up.
2*This was determined when the road was built and the ditches installed, however things change a lot in 100 years. In some cases the changes are drastic.
One example is a 24 "culvert buried 15 feet or more under the road bed to handle a small creek only problem is there is no creek there now so no need for a culvert that deep anymore. It don't need to be that big either. Do you need the same size culvert for a small to medium ditch as you do for creeks and runs?
Several years ago the state replaced the old rusted out culvert with a new one.
Instead of installing the replacement to fit / blend in with the present terrain they put the new one right where the old one was.
As a result we now have a huge hole within 3 feet of the edge of the pavement big enough to swallow up a large van or even small trucks that are bigger than pick ups.
To make matters worse the road ditch was filled in leaving a perfect runway dead ending with a drop off right into that hole.
3*With or without considering the culvert nothing has been done about the screwed up ditch.
4*I don't think a ditch that varies back and forth between 3 to 5 foot wide and deep was determined by drainage need or anything else.
The one size fits all mentality is the big problem with government regulation.

Mr Brown, in this case I'm not sure government regulation is the problem. I think maybe the workers that installed these culverts might have contributed to the problem.

As for culvert size, as I said our government changed the rules regarding minimum culvert size. Since I don't figure any of them are reading these posts, I'll say that I have installed some driveway culverts for landowners that are smaller than 15" in areas with minimum drainage and landscaped ditches that they maintain by mowing. I won't tear up someone's well mowed ditch to put in an oversized culvert. I just always make sure the landowner understands that they need to maintain it and keep the ends open.

As for the small culvert in a deep ditch. I have some like that too. Most of mine are caused by land owners not allowing me to go upstream and redesign the ditch. To raise the culvert, you have to raise the bottom of the ditch upstream until it has proper drainage. Our laws give us a 40 foot right of way. I have land owners that will not allow me to get past that 40 foot boundary. I have incidents where I had to haul dirt in with a dump truck because the landowner would not let me on his land to redesign the ditch an use the dirt to fix the road. The same road that the landowner uses to get to town.

As for a hole at the edge of the road. I avoid those at all costs. In one case I installed 120 feet of culvert so I could design a slope on each side gentle enough to mow. Your example sounds like they put in too short of culvert. Again, poor workmanship.

I always involve the landowners on both sides of the road in the decision making process. I always make sure I leave their land in better shape than I found it. I have even spent hours in people's yards with a rake and shovel picking up clods so they can mow. I even rebuild fence that needs moved for a project. But I also have the government side to please in regards to their requirements of culvert size and design. So I'm just the little guy caught in the middle. :)
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2012 DIAMOND CARGO FOOD TRAILER (A52472)
2012 DIAMOND CARGO...
2002 KENWORTH W900 TRI AXLE (A52472)
2002 KENWORTH W900...
2024 New Holland T8.410 MFWD Tractor (A52748)
2024 New Holland...
2017 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER SPORT (A52472)
2017 MITSUBISHI...
2002 Fleetwood Expedition 36ft Motorhome (A51694)
2002 Fleetwood...
2016 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A50324)
2016 Ford Explorer...
 
Top