Maybe I see it too simple or missed the issue completely. I've cut some wood but don't see why you seem to think there are mysterious angles to cut for this project. I could be missing something in your description.
Any compound cut can be broken into two cuts which, when combined become a compound cut but you can look at each cut separately to get a brain cell around it.
Keep in mind: If all you do is a bevel cut (0 degrees miter)the sides are cut at the bevel angle and the cuts along the top and bottom will be square to the sides. Similarly, if all you do is a miter cut (0 degrees bevel) the top and bottom are cut at the miter angle and the cuts along the sides are square to the top and bottom.
When you put the two together to cut the compound angle the same ideas will hold true. The miter angle will be cut on top and bottom of the work and the bevel angle will be cut in the sides. If you want to lay this out on your stock, scribe the miter angle across the top side, scribe the bevel angle
on the sides, then the miter angle along the bottom. If you scribe precisely the scribe lines will all connect at the corners.
Does this not work?
For your project I just see this as follows. You have one leg coming off one side of the central square tube with 30 degree bevel angle (no miter) to slope the leg down. The other two legs need this same bevel angle but they also need a 30 degree miter to rotate the legs to get the equal leg spacing.
In the end the bevel angles are seen on the sides of the leg, the miter angles are on top and bottom. What have I missed? What's to calculate?
If you want 30 degree bevel and 30 degree miter these are scribed directly on the stock as above. No need to cut a wooden piece then measure angles and transfer to steel. If you measured 35 degrees on the intermediate wooden model, that's a cutting error you just transferred to your steel.