PBinWA
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2004
- Messages
- 906
- Location
- WA
- Tractor
- Kioti NX55, Mahindra 2615, Case 36CXB, Case W4, Volvo MC85C
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Health insurance costs are terrible, but I don't see how you can do without. I don't know what the solution is. They have the socialized medicine in Canada, but since they don't need the defense budget we have (who do you think is providing the bulk of the defense for this hemisphere?) they can afford it. How good it is I don't know but have heard there are waiting periods for various procedures that you don't experience here. Also, such a system might not attract the best doctors because their earnings is capped. I would imagine some of our Canadian friends on here could enlighten us.
If there was a reasonable way to have that here I would be all for it, but I don't see how. Right now I am paying through the nose for good HMO coverage, and it just keeps going up. )</font>
I'm Canadian but now live in the US. Let's put it this way. If you lived in Canada everyone (even those with employer subsidized healthcare) would be paying that additional 10K (or a lot more) a year in taxes. So in some ways the USA is better because you actually have a choice down here. Unfortunately, this freedom of choice is something that tends to get abused, people don't manage their finances properly, and the health insurance never gets purchased.
Really, at the end of the day your employer is providing your healthcare benefits out of your salary. If they didn't pay for healthcare then they would probably have to pay you more. It's actually a cheap perk for employers to provide healthcare instead of paying employees more and letting the employees make the choice. Again, in this scenario half to two thirds of the employees probably wouldn't ever get around to buying the insurance. Having healthy and insured employees is also in the employers best interest from a continuity of workforce perspective.
AFAIK, there are state and federal programs that guarantee healthcare to all children under the ages of 18 in the USA. Often, people are unaware of these programs so this confusion is sometimes an issue. I also believe that most people who are on welfare or qualify at a certain low income level are also able to get government funded healthcare. Where I live, this healthcare coverage is probably better than what I get from my employer.
The quality of healthcare that I have received in my 8 years in the US has been faster and better than anything I had previously received in Canada. The wait times in Canada are terrible and the system has developed into a "delay it until it is an emergency" form of health care system.
Of course, I'm a conservative guy and I think people should only have to pay for what they use rather than have to pay for stuff that they are not using.
In Canada they also don't award the huge million/billion dollar pain & suffering awards in law suits so that helps to keep the malpractice insurance costs down.
AFAIK, there are only three countries in the world that offer state funded single tier health care: Cuba, North Korea, and Canada. /forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif
If there was a reasonable way to have that here I would be all for it, but I don't see how. Right now I am paying through the nose for good HMO coverage, and it just keeps going up. )</font>
I'm Canadian but now live in the US. Let's put it this way. If you lived in Canada everyone (even those with employer subsidized healthcare) would be paying that additional 10K (or a lot more) a year in taxes. So in some ways the USA is better because you actually have a choice down here. Unfortunately, this freedom of choice is something that tends to get abused, people don't manage their finances properly, and the health insurance never gets purchased.
Really, at the end of the day your employer is providing your healthcare benefits out of your salary. If they didn't pay for healthcare then they would probably have to pay you more. It's actually a cheap perk for employers to provide healthcare instead of paying employees more and letting the employees make the choice. Again, in this scenario half to two thirds of the employees probably wouldn't ever get around to buying the insurance. Having healthy and insured employees is also in the employers best interest from a continuity of workforce perspective.
AFAIK, there are state and federal programs that guarantee healthcare to all children under the ages of 18 in the USA. Often, people are unaware of these programs so this confusion is sometimes an issue. I also believe that most people who are on welfare or qualify at a certain low income level are also able to get government funded healthcare. Where I live, this healthcare coverage is probably better than what I get from my employer.
The quality of healthcare that I have received in my 8 years in the US has been faster and better than anything I had previously received in Canada. The wait times in Canada are terrible and the system has developed into a "delay it until it is an emergency" form of health care system.
Of course, I'm a conservative guy and I think people should only have to pay for what they use rather than have to pay for stuff that they are not using.
In Canada they also don't award the huge million/billion dollar pain & suffering awards in law suits so that helps to keep the malpractice insurance costs down.
AFAIK, there are only three countries in the world that offer state funded single tier health care: Cuba, North Korea, and Canada. /forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif