</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Guys, we are mixing up seperate issues here. The only thing the Magnuson Moss Act does is protect the consumer from having to use OEM parts)</font>
No.. the Act deals with Warranties and their definitions. When they can be defaulted on and such. It is much broader than what you mention.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( CubTech; If you alter/tamper with the unit at all you will void the factory warranty. )</font>
Cub.. your are wrong, plain and simple. The Act specifically allows ANY modification to a unit. Modification not ONLY covers oil filters and other items, but also physical modification. Before a warranty can LEGALLY be refused, an owner modification (of <font color="red">ANY</font> type) must be DIRECTLY proven (by the dealer or manufacturer) to have been the cause of the problem and not a defect. If an owner decides disassemble his entire tractor and use the parts for something else, not a single safety interlock survives the owners assault, and the owner finds out that a tire had a puncture from the factory... guess what... the dealer gets to either replace the tire or break the law by defaulting on the warranty.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( The dealer cannot let a machine go out the door without an originally installed safety feature, as this could somehow be traced back to them. Magnuson-Moss has nothing to due with bypassing a safety device.)</font>
Magnuson-Moss has to do with warranties. See above.
No.. the Act deals with Warranties and their definitions. When they can be defaulted on and such. It is much broader than what you mention.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( CubTech; If you alter/tamper with the unit at all you will void the factory warranty. )</font>
Cub.. your are wrong, plain and simple. The Act specifically allows ANY modification to a unit. Modification not ONLY covers oil filters and other items, but also physical modification. Before a warranty can LEGALLY be refused, an owner modification (of <font color="red">ANY</font> type) must be DIRECTLY proven (by the dealer or manufacturer) to have been the cause of the problem and not a defect. If an owner decides disassemble his entire tractor and use the parts for something else, not a single safety interlock survives the owners assault, and the owner finds out that a tire had a puncture from the factory... guess what... the dealer gets to either replace the tire or break the law by defaulting on the warranty.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( The dealer cannot let a machine go out the door without an originally installed safety feature, as this could somehow be traced back to them. Magnuson-Moss has nothing to due with bypassing a safety device.)</font>
Magnuson-Moss has to do with warranties. See above.