ponytug
Super Member
I enjoyed reading the 6 cycle engine material, but as soon as I read that he hadn't dyno tested it, I lost all interest. If you aren't measuring a variable, you can't improve it. So, my takeaway is that he isn't serious about making a better engine, he's just having fun. (no harm in having fun. And you can make a good dyno for less than $100 for the size engine he has.)
There is a ton of material out there, like algae companies that haven't worked out the cost of the ponds and pumps, or the algae company that claimed that they would get twice as much energy out in biodiesel as fell in sunlight on the ponds, or solar companies that assume the equipment works for thirty years, but neglects to include normal degradation in the photovoltaics, or 10 year replacements of inverters, or assume that oil will be $175/bbl or electricity rates rise at 10%/yr, or a carbon tax will be implemented next year...
As Dr. Phil says, "Get real"...
That said there are lots of interesting technologies out there and some of them might even be successful. You wouldn't need to haul around that much water; the military already reclaims water from engines as route to quality water in the field. There was a guy thirty years ago that claimed to have a 'modern' steam engine, recycling the water, with fancy triangular pistons. It seems to have been lost without a trace; I often wonder what tripped it up.
All the best,
Peter
There is a ton of material out there, like algae companies that haven't worked out the cost of the ponds and pumps, or the algae company that claimed that they would get twice as much energy out in biodiesel as fell in sunlight on the ponds, or solar companies that assume the equipment works for thirty years, but neglects to include normal degradation in the photovoltaics, or 10 year replacements of inverters, or assume that oil will be $175/bbl or electricity rates rise at 10%/yr, or a carbon tax will be implemented next year...
As Dr. Phil says, "Get real"...
That said there are lots of interesting technologies out there and some of them might even be successful. You wouldn't need to haul around that much water; the military already reclaims water from engines as route to quality water in the field. There was a guy thirty years ago that claimed to have a 'modern' steam engine, recycling the water, with fancy triangular pistons. It seems to have been lost without a trace; I often wonder what tripped it up.
All the best,
Peter
I think looking at those different technologies very interesting too. Most of the stuff you find on the interweb kinda funny.
But some, like say the six cycle engine, look interesting but you wonder about the water that will need to be hauled around. I guess they had to figure that out in the previous centuries with steam engines.